Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF ) Freely available
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (32)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by McMahon, C. A.
Right arrow Articles by Tennant, C. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by McMahon, C. A.
Right arrow Articles by Tennant, C. C.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Human Reproduction, Vol. 18, No. 4, 871-877, April 2003
© 2003 European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology

Embryo donation for medical research: attitudes and concerns of potential donors

Catherine A. McMahon1,5, Frances L. Gibson1, Garth I. Leslie2, Douglas M. Saunders2,4, Katherine A. Porter4 and Christopher C. Tennant3

1 Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, Departments of 2 Obstetrics and Gynaecology and 3 Psychological Medicine, University of Sydney Northern Clinical School at Royal North Shore Hospital Sydney and 4 North Shore Fertility, North Shore Fertility, Sydney, Australia

5 To whom correspondence should be addressed at: Department of Psychology, Macquarie University, North Ryde, 2109, NSW, Australia. e-mail: cmcmahon{at}psy.mq.edu.au

BACKGROUND: The recent derivation of embryonic stem cell lines from human blastocysts and related implications for regenerative medicine has intensified a longstanding debate about the use of human embryos for research purposes. However, studies have shown that few couples with stored embryos opt to donate them for research. Herein, the attitudes and concerns of potential embryo donors to donation of surplus embryos for medical research were examined. METHODS: From a total of 509 couples who had stored frozen embryos and who had received a questionnaire about embryo donations for medical research, 152 women (30%) and 123 male partners (24%) responded. Embryos had been stored for a mean of 2.25 years (range 3 months to 12 years). RESULTS: Some 10% of respondents indicated it probable, and 34% possible, that they would donate their surplus embryos for research in the future. Women respondents whose embryos had been stored longer, and those committed to the practice of a religion, were more worried about their embryos. Respondents positively disposed to donation commented on their desire not to waste embryos, a desire to help infertile couples, and/or to advance scientific knowledge. Those with negative views commented on the embryo as a potential child and expressed concerns about a perceived lack of control over the type of research to be carried out. CONCLUSIONS: Findings indicate a need for tailored education and counselling about embryo donation for medical research.

Key words: attitudes/embryo donation/medical research


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
S. Goedeke and D. Payne
Embryo donation in New Zealand: a pilot study
Hum. Reprod., May 9, 2009; (2009) dep116v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
M. Mohler-Kuo, U. Zellweger, A. Duran, M. K. Hohl, F. Gutzwiller, and M. Mutsch
Attitudes of couples towards the destination of surplus embryos: results among couples with cryopreserved embryos in Switzerland
Hum. Reprod., May 4, 2009; (2009) dep103v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
V. Provoost, G. Pennings, P. De Sutter, J. Gerris, A. Van de Velde, E. De Lissnyder, and M. Dhont
Infertility patients' beliefs about their embryos and their disposition preferences
Hum. Reprod., April 1, 2009; 24(4): 896 - 905.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
G. Fuscaldo, S. Russell, and L. Gillam
How to facilitate decisions about surplus embryos: patients' views
Hum. Reprod., December 1, 2007; 22(12): 3129 - 3138.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
B. C. Heng
Independent counselling on embryo donation for infertility patients
Hum. Reprod., August 1, 2007; 22(8): 2346 - 2348.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
S. de Lacey
Decisions for the fate of frozen embryos: Fresh insights into patients' thinking and their rationales for donating or discarding embryos
Hum. Reprod., June 1, 2007; 22(6): 1751 - 1758.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
S. de Lacey
Embryo research: is disclosing commercial intent enough?
Hum. Reprod., July 1, 2006; 21(7): 1662 - 1667.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
S. de Lacey
Parent identity and 'virtual' children: why patients discard rather than donate unused embryos
Hum. Reprod., June 1, 2005; 20(6): 1661 - 1669.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
S. Bangsboll, A. Pinborg, C. Yding Andersen, and A. Nyboe Andersen
Patients' attitudes towards donation of surplus cryopreserved embryos for treatment or research
Hum. Reprod., October 1, 2004; 19(10): 2415 - 2419.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
M. Choudhary, E. Haimes, M. Herbert, M. Stojkovic, and A.P. Murdoch
Demographic, medical and treatment characteristics associated with couples' decisions to donate fresh spare embryos for research
Hum. Reprod., September 1, 2004; 19(9): 2091 - 2096.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
S. de Lacey and R.J. Norman
What should we do with donated embryos that may be genetically affected?
Hum. Reprod., May 1, 2004; 19(5): 1065 - 1068.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.