Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (Abstract-only PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (15)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Johnson, N.P.
Right arrow Articles by Farquhar, C.M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Johnson, N.P.
Right arrow Articles by Farquhar, C.M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Human Reproduction, Vol. 18, No. 5, 947-954, May 2003
© 2003 European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology

Gaps in the evidence for fertility treatment—an analysis of the Cochrane Menstrual Disorders and Subfertility Group database

N.P. Johnson1,2,3,4, M. Proctor1,2 and C.M. Farquhar1,2,3

1 Cochrane Menstrual Disorders & Subfertility Group Editorial Base, 2 University of Auckland, and 3 Fertility Plus, Obstetrics & Gynaecology Department, National Women’s Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand

4 To whom correspondence should be addressed at: The University Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, National Women’s Hospital, Claude Road, Epsom, Auckland, New Zealand. e-mail: n.johnson{at}auckland.ac.nz

BACKGROUND: The randomized controlled trial is considered the best approach to assess the effectiveness of treatments. The aim was to summarize the available evidence and determine gaps in the evidence for clinical decision making in subfertility. METHODS: A search of the Cochrane Library for Menstrual Disorders and Subfertility Group reviews was undertaken and, where the reviews were related to subfertility, the authors’ conclusions were appraised and correlated with the results and meta-analysis sections of the reviews. Each review was then categorized as to what extent it had answered the clinical question posed by the reviewers. RESULTS: Of 38 subfertility reviews currently or previously published on the Cochrane Library from the Menstrual Disorders and Subfertility Group, 12 reviews concluded that there was evidence of effectiveness of the interventions studied. There was insufficient evidence of effectiveness in 26 reviews, from which the authors of 23 reviews called for further research. A tabulated summary of the review conclusions is presented. CONCLUSION: Cochrane subfertility reviews have eliminated some gaps in the evidence and highlighted others. Future clinical trial design should focus on adequate power and reporting the major outcome of live-births per couple as well as adverse events.

Key words: Cochrane systematic review/evidence-based/gaps/infertility/subfertility


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Am Board Fam MedHome page
J. B. Stanford, T. A. Parnell, and P. C. Boyle
Outcomes From Treatment of Infertility With Natural Procreative Technology in an Irish General Practice
J Am Board Fam Med, September 1, 2008; 21(5): 375 - 384.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
M.F.G. Verberg, M.J.C. Eijkemans, E.M.E.W. Heijnen, F.J. Broekmans, C. de Klerk, B.C.J.M. Fauser, and N.S. Macklon
Why do couples drop-out from IVF treatment? A prospective cohort study
Hum. Reprod., September 1, 2008; 23(9): 2050 - 2055.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
T. J. Selman, N. P. Johnson, J. Zamora, and K. S. Khan
Gynaecologic surgery from uncertainty to science: evolution of randomized control trials
Hum. Reprod., April 1, 2008; 23(4): 827 - 831.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
N.P. Johnson, T. Selman, J. Zamora, and K.S. Khan
Gynaecologic surgery from uncertainty to science: evidence-based surgery is no passing fad
Hum. Reprod., April 1, 2008; 23(4): 832 - 839.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum Reprod UpdateHome page
A. Maheshwari, L. Stofberg, and S. Bhattacharya
Effect of overweight and obesity on assisted reproductive technology a systematic review
Hum. Reprod. Update, September 1, 2007; 13(5): 433 - 444.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Endocr. Rev.Home page
N. S. Macklon, R. L. Stouffer, L. C. Giudice, and B. C. J. M. Fauser
The Science behind 25 Years of Ovarian Stimulation for in Vitro Fertilization
Endocr. Rev., April 1, 2006; 27(2): 170 - 207.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
M. Porter, and S. Bhattacharya
Investigation of staff and patients' opinions of a proposed trial of elective single embryo transfer
Hum. Reprod., September 1, 2005; 20(9): 2523 - 2530.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
D.H. Barlow
Announcement: New Departures for Human Reproduction in 2004
Hum. Reprod., September 1, 2004; 19(9): 1931 - 1932.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
D.H. Barlow
A time for consensus and consistency of reporting in clinical studies and the importance of new basic research
Hum. Reprod., January 1, 2004; 19(1): 1 - 2.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
D. H. Barlow
The design, publication and interpretation of research in Subfertility Medicine: uncomfortable issues and challenges to be faced
Hum. Reprod., May 1, 2003; 18(5): 899 - 901.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.