Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF ) Freely available
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Haimov-Kochman, R.
Right arrow Articles by Spitz, I. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Haimov-Kochman, R.
Right arrow Articles by Spitz, I. M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Human Reproduction, Vol. 18, No. 6, 1231-1233, June 2003
© 2003 European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology

Management of a perforated levonorgestrel-medicated intrauterine device—a pharmacokinetic study: Case report

Ronit Haimov-Kochman1,3, Hagay Amsalem1, Amiram Adoni1, Yuval Lavy1 and Irving M. Spitz2

1 Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hadassah University Hospital and 2 Institute of Hormone Research, Shaare-Zedek Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel

3 To whom correspondence should be addressed at: Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hadassah University Hospital, Mount Scopus, P.O.B 24035 Il-91240, Jerusalem, Israel. e-mail: rkochman{at}hotmail.com

Intrauterine contraception is a widely used, highly effective method of birth control. Uterine perforation is a serious albeit rare complication with the use of an intrauterine device (IUD). Although uterine perforation by the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (LNG-IUS) has already been described, no plasma LNG concentrations in this setting were reported. Neither has the management of LNG-IUS been commented on to date. Two months after insertion of an LNG-IUS into a 33-year-old woman, it was noted to be in the peritoneal cavity. Laparoscopy for IUD removal was conducted 5 months after insertion. LNG and sex hormone-binding globulin plasma concentrations were measured prior to and following the laparoscopic removal of the IUD. Intra-peritoneal dislocated LNG-IUS resulted in plasma LNG levels 10 times higher (4.7 nmol/l) than the plasma level of LNG observed with LNG-IUS placed in utero. This high plasma LNG level suppresses ovulation. Therefore a misplaced LNG-IUS should be removed when pregnancy is desired.

Key words: intrauterine device/levonorgestrel/perforation/pharmacokinetics/progestagen


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.