Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF ) Freely available
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (12)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by El-Toukhy, T.
Right arrow Articles by Braude, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by El-Toukhy, T.
Right arrow Articles by Braude, P.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Human Reproduction, Vol. 18, No. 6, 1313-1318, June 2003
© 2003 European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology

Cryo-thawed embryos obtained from conception cycles have double the implantation and pregnancy potential of those from unsuccessful cycles

T. El-Toukhy1, Y. Khalaf, K. Al-Darazi, F. O’Mahony, E. Wharf, A. Taylor and P. Braude

Assisted Conception Unit, Guy’s and St Thomas’ Hospital NHS Trust, St Thomas’ Street, London SE1 9RT, UK

1 To whom correspondence should be addressed. e-mail: tarekeltoukhy{at}hotmail.com

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the influence of fresh IVF/ICSI cycle outcome on the prognosis of the related frozen embryo replacement (FER) cycle. METHODS: 459 FER cycles, involving 2049 cleavage stage embryos with no or up to 10% fragmentation, were performed for which the outcome of the fresh cycle was recorded. The cycles were divided into two groups; group A included cycles in which cryopreserved embryos were obtained from fresh cycles in which conception occurred. Group B were cycles in which cryopreserved embryos originated from unsuccessful fresh cycles. RESULTS: Groups A and B were comparable with respect to mean (± SD) age at cryopreservation (33 ± 3.9 versus 33.2 ± 4 years, P = not significant), mean number of oocytes retrieved and fertilized normally in the fresh cycle (11 ± 5.2 versus 11.2 ± 4.8, P = not significant) and mean age at the cryo-thawed transfer (34.5 ± 4.2 versus 33.9 ± 4 years, P = not significant). No significant difference was found between the two groups with regard to mean number of embryos cryopreserved (6.5 ± 3.9 versus 6.2 ± 3.6) and subsequently thawed (4.5 ± 2.5 versus 4.5 ± 1.8) per cycle and number of cryo-thawed embryos transferred per cycle (2.0 ± 0.7 versus 2.1 ± 0.8). However, the implantation rate per transferred embryo in group A was double that in group B (23 versus 11.2%, P < 0.0001). Moreover, the clinical pregnancy and ongoing pregnancy rates per cycle were significantly higher in group A compared with group B (34.8 and 27.3% versus 15.6 and 13.1%, P < 0.0001 and P = 0.0003 respectively). The difference in FER cycle outcome could not be explained by confounding variables. CONCLUSIONS: After thawing, cryopreserved embryos originating from conception IVF/ICSI cycles achieve double the implantation and pregnancy rates of those obtained from unsuccessful cycles.

Key words: cryo-thawed cycle prognosis/embryo cryopreservation/IVF outcome


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
S. Polinder, E.M.E.W. Heijnen, N.S. Macklon, J.D.F. Habbema, B.J.C.M. Fauser, and M.J.C. Eijkemans
Cost-effectiveness of a mild compared with a standard strategy for IVF: a randomized comparison using cumulative term live birth as the primary endpoint
Hum. Reprod., February 1, 2008; 23(2): 316 - 323.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.