Human Reproduction, Vol. 18, No. 7, 1417-1421,
July 2003
© 2003 European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology
The births of five Spanish babies from cryopreserved donated oocytes
Instituto de Reproducción CEFER, Marquesa de Vilallonga 12, 08017 Barcelona, Spain
1 To whom correspondence should be addressed. e-mail: info{at}institutocefer.com
BACKGROUND: The technique of freezing oocytes is still not widely used. Reasons cited for this include the technique’s low efficacy and the risk of aneuploidy. However, the introduction of technical changes (the type and concentration of cryoprotective substances; slow freezing and rapid thawing; and fertilization by ICSI) has led to improved results. We present four pregnancies obtained using mature oocytes (in metaphase II) that had been frozen and thawed. The oocytes were donated by young women who were not patients. METHODS: The frozen oocytes (n = 88) came from seven donors aged 18–25 years. The metaphase II oocytes, morphologically normal in appearance, were denuded of their cumulus–corona complex. The cryoprotective freezing solution contained 1,2-propanediol (1.5 mol/l) and sucrose (0.3 mol/l). Freezing was slow and thawing rapid. The oocytes were fertilized by ICSI. RESULTS: Seventy-nine of the 88 thawed oocytes survived (89.8%); 58 were fertilized (73.4% of all those microinjected); and 26 were transferred (44.8% of all those fertilized). Four pregnancies were produced after seven transfers (57.1%). Five children were born from four pregnancies. CONCLUSIONS: With the freezing/thawing technique used, oocyte survival was high (
90%). The pregnancy rate with frozen oocytes was similar to that obtained using fresh oocytes from donors (50%).
Key words: birth/human/oocyte cryopreservation/oocyte donation
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  U.-B. Wennerholm, V. Soderstrom-Anttila, C. Bergh, K. Aittomaki, J. Hazekamp, K.-G. Nygren, A. Selbing, and A. Loft Children born after cryopreservation of embryos or oocytes: a systematic review of outcome data Hum. Reprod., September 1, 2009; 24(9): 2158 - 2172. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M. Xu, E. R. West-Farrell, R. L. Stouffer, L. D. Shea, T. K. Woodruff, and M. B. Zelinski Encapsulated Three-Dimensional Culture Supports Development of Nonhuman Primate Secondary Follicles Biol Reprod, September 1, 2009; 81(3): 587 - 594. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 Shanshan Gao, Yuan Li, Xuan Gao, Jingmei Hu, Huijun Yang, and Z.-J. Chen Spindle and Chromosome Changes of Human MII Oocytes During Incubation After Slow Freezing/Fast Thawing Procedures Reproductive Sciences, April 1, 2009; 16(4): 391 - 396. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
L. Parmegiani, G.E. Cognigni, S. Bernardi, W. Ciampaglia, F. Infante, P. Pocognoli, C. T. de Fatis, E. Troilo, and M. Filicori Freezing within 2 h from oocyte retrieval increases the efficiency of human oocyte cryopreservation when using a slow freezing/rapid thawing protocol with high sucrose concentration Hum. Reprod., August 1, 2008; 23(8): 1771 - 1777. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 D. A. Gook and D. H. Edgar Human oocyte cryopreservation Hum. Reprod. Update, November 1, 2007; 13(6): 591 - 605. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M.G. Larman, M.G. Katz-Jaffe, C.B. Sheehan, and D.K. Gardner 1,2-propanediol and the type of cryopreservation procedure adversely affect mouse oocyte physiology Hum. Reprod., January 1, 2007; 22(1): 250 - 259. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. Borini, R. Sciajno, V. Bianchi, E. Sereni, C. Flamigni, and G. Coticchio Clinical outcome of oocyte cryopreservation after slow cooling with a protocol utilizing a high sucrose concentration Hum. Reprod., February 1, 2006; 21(2): 512 - 517. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
P.E. Levi Setti, E. Albani, P.V. Novara, A. Cesana, and G. Morreale Cryopreservation of supernumerary oocytes in IVF/ICSI cycles Hum. Reprod., February 1, 2006; 21(2): 370 - 375. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
X.-H. Li, S.-U. Chen, X. Zhang, M. Tang, Y.-R. Kui, X. Wu, S. Wang, and Y.-L. Guo Cryopreserved oocytes of infertile couples undergoing assisted reproductive technology could be an important source of oocyte donation: a clinical report of successful pregnancies Hum. Reprod., December 1, 2005; 20(12): 3390 - 3394. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S.-U. Chen, Y.-R. Lien, H.-F. Chen, L.-J. Chang, Y.-Y. Tsai, and Y.-S. Yang Observational clinical follow-up of oocyte cryopreservation using a slow-freezing method with 1,2-propanediol plus sucrose followed by ICSI Hum. Reprod., July 1, 2005; 20(7): 1975 - 1980. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
X.Y. Cai, G.A. Chen, Y. Lian, X.Y. Zheng, and H.M. Peng Cryoloop vitrification of rabbit oocytes Hum. Reprod., July 1, 2005; 20(7): 1969 - 1974. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S.J. Paynter, A. Borini, V. Bianchi, L. De Santis, C. Flamigni, and G. Coticchio Volume changes of mature human oocytes on exposure to cryoprotectant solutions used in slow cooling procedures Hum. Reprod., May 1, 2005; 20(5): 1194 - 1199. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 R. G. Gosden Prospects for Oocyte Banking and In Vitro Maturation J Natl Cancer Inst Monographs, March 1, 2005; 2005(34): 60 - 63. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
Z.J. Chen, M. Li, Y. Li, L.X. Zhao, R. Tang, Y. Sheng, X. Gao, C.H. Chang, and H.L. Feng Effects of sucrose concentration on the developmental potential of human frozen-thawed oocytes at different stages of maturity Hum. Reprod., October 1, 2004; 19(10): 2345 - 2349. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. Jones, J. Van Blerkom, P. Davis, and A. A. Toledo Cryopreservation of metaphase II human oocytes effects mitochondrial membrane potential: implications for developmental competence Hum. Reprod., August 1, 2004; 19(8): 1861 - 1866. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S.F. Mullen, Y. Agca, D.C. Broermann, C.L. Jenkins, C.A. Johnson, and J.K. Critser The effect of osmotic stress on the metaphase II spindle of human oocytes, and the relevance to cryopreservation. Hum. Reprod., May 1, 2004; 19(5): 1148 - 1154. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|