Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF ) Freely available
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (3)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Vahratian, A.
Right arrow Articles by Jeng, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Vahratian, A.
Right arrow Articles by Jeng, G.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Human Reproduction, Vol. 18, No. 7, 1442-1448, July 2003
© 2003 European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology

Live-birth rates and multiple-birth risk of assisted reproductive technology pregnancies conceived using thawed embryos, USA 1999–2000

Anjel Vahratian1, Laura A. Schieve, Meredith A. Reynolds and Gary Jeng

Division of Reproductive Health, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA

1 To whom correspondence should be addressed at: Division of Epidemiology, Statistics & Prevention Research, National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, Department of Health & Human Services, 6100 Executive Blvd., Room 7B03, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA. e-mail: vahratia{at}mail.nih.gov

BACKGROUND: Increasing use of assisted reproductive technology treatments has been associated with the current rise in multiple births in the USA. Embryo cryopreservation and subsequent thawed embryo transfer may favourably impact the multiple-birth risk by relieving some pressure that patients and providers may feel to transfer several embryos in a single cycle. The study objective was to examine both live-birth rates and multiple-birth risk in thawed cycles. METHODS: The authors used a population-based sample of 21 555 assisted reproductive technology procedures performed in US clinics in 1999 and 2000 that used thawed embryos derived from the patient’s oocytes. RESULTS: Both patient age and the number of embryos transferred were independent predictors of live birth. Even among women aged 20–29 years, the transfer of three embryos resulted in an increase in the live-birth rate compared with cycles in which one or two embryos were transferred. This increase in success was accompanied by an increased multiple-birth risk. In all age groups up to 40 years, the transfer of just two embryos resulted in a multiple-birth risk of 16–17%. The multiple-birth risk increased with the number of embryos transferred. CONCLUSIONS: Patient age and the number of embryos transferred significantly affect live-birth and multiple-birth rates among women who use thawed embryos.

Key words: assisted reproductive technology/embryo cryopreservation/multiple birth/thawed embryo transfer


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
I. E. Messinis and E. Domali
What is the most relevant standard of success in assisted reproduction?: Should BESST really be the primary endpoint for assisted reproduction?
Hum. Reprod., September 1, 2004; 19(9): 1933 - 1935.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
L. A. Schieve and M. A. Reynolds
What is the most relevant standard of success in assisted reproduction?: Challenges in measuring and reporting success rates for assisted reproductive technology treatments: What is optimal?
Hum. Reprod., April 1, 2004; 19(4): 778 - 782.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.