Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF ) Freely available
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (11)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dören, M.
Right arrow Articles by Johnell, O.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Dören, M.
Right arrow Articles by Johnell, O.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Human Reproduction, Vol. 18, No. 8, 1737-1746, August 2003
© 2003 European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology

Effects of specific post-menopausal hormone therapies on bone mineral density in post-menopausal women: a meta-analysis

Martina Dören1,4, Jan-Åke Nilsson2 and Olof Johnell3

1 Free University of Berlin, Clinical Research Center of Women’s Health, Klingsorst 109a, D-12203 Berlin, Germany, 2 Department of Medicine, University of Lund and 3 Department of Orthopaedics, Malmö University Hospital, University of Lund, S-20502 Malmö, Sweden

4 To whom correspondence should be addressed. e-mail: martina.doeren{at}medizin.fu-berlin.de

BACKGROUND: Long-term post-menopausal hormone therapy (pHT) was often regarded as first-line therapy to prevent fractures in post-menopausal women, a recommendation under scrutiny given the benefit–risk profile of the Women’s Health Initiative results of the estrogen–progestin combination. Apart from controlled clinical studies providing data with fractures as an end point, measures of lumbar and hip bone mineral density (BMD) may be used to assess bone-related effects of pHT. The objective of this study was to conduct a systematic review of 2-year trials, published between 1990 and December 2002, and assessing changes in BMD by any estrogen including ethinyl estradiol, any estrogen plus any progestin, or tibolone. METHODS: We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE and systematic reviews. Thirty-nine randomized, prospective, controlled 2-year trials were analysed in pre-specified groups according to the profile of the compounds. RESULTS: Virtually all pHT regimens at least maintain BMD at the lumbar spine and the hip compared with baseline; there is no apparent difference between the various estrogenic compounds. Tibolone, a synthetic progestin, appears to be as effective as any estrogen. Most trials were conducted in early post-menopausal women, fewer in women with hysterectomy and/or bilateral oophorectomy. CONCLUSIONS: The size of impact on BMD does not appear to differ between tibolone and any estrogen compound studied.

Key words: bone mineral density/estrogen replacement therapy/post-menopausal hormone therapy/prevention of post-menopausal osteoporosis/tibolone


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Nutr.Home page
L.-J. W. Lu, F. Nayeem, K. E. Anderson, J. J. Grady, and M. Nagamani
Lean Body Mass, Not Estrogen or Progesterone, Predicts Peak Bone Mineral Density in Premenopausal Women
J. Nutr., February 1, 2009; 139(2): 250 - 256.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur J EndocrinolHome page
A. Mueller, R. Dittrich, H. Binder, W. Kuehnel, T. Maltaris, I. Hoffmann, and M. W Beckmann
High dose estrogen treatment increases bone mineral density in male-to-female transsexuals receiving gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist in the absence of testosterone
Eur. J. Endocrinol., July 1, 2005; 153(1): 107 - 113.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.