Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF ) Freely available
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (12)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Moriwaki, T.
Right arrow Articles by Furuhashi, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Moriwaki, T.
Right arrow Articles by Furuhashi, M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Human Reproduction, Vol. 19, No. 1, 152-156, January 2004
© 2004 European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology

Embryo evaluation by analysing blastomere nuclei

Takayuki Moriwaki1, Nobuhiko Suganuma2,4, Mina Hayakawa1, Hiroko Hibi1, Yoshinari Katsumata1, Hidenori Oguchi1 and Madoka Furuhashi3

1 Infertility Center, Toyota Memorial Hospital, Toyota 471-8513, 2 Infertility Center, Toyohashi Municipal Hospital, 50 Hakken-nishi, Aotake-cho, Toyohashi 441-8570 and 3 Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Japanese Red Cross Nagoya First Hospital, Nagoya 453-8511, Japan

4 To whom correspondence should be addressed. e-mail: sugasan{at}par.odn.ne.jp

BACKGROUND: To create a more effective selection standard for early embryos, we developed a new grading system consisting of conventional morphological evaluation in combination with analysis of blastomere nuclei. METHODS: A total of 744 embryos used during 459 cycles of embryo transfer on day 2 and blastocyst transfer were subjected to retrospective analysis. The overall implantation rate was 15.5% (115/744). Morphological evaluation of the embryos was performed on day 2 by referring to both the size of blastomere and fragmentation (conventional method) and the nucleic features of the blastomeres—either multinucleated or anucleic (nuclei counting method). The implantation rate for every transferred embryo and blastocyst was examined. RESULTS: Although a high implantation rate was observed with the highest quality embryos as judged by either the conventional method (24.1%; 57/237) or the nuclei counting method (26.1%; 104/399), the nuclei counting method predicted implantation rate better than the conventional method. The embryos that were considered to be high quality according to the conventional method, but low quality according to the nuclei counting method, had a limited implantation success rate of 6.3% (4/66). Also, after blastocyst transfer, implantation occurred most often when high quality embryos evaluated by the nuclei counting method were used (25.5%; 25/98), while the blastocysts from low quality embryos seldom implanted (3.2%; 2/63). CONCLUSIONS: When choosing which embryo to transfer, the normality of blastomere nuclei may be a more important index of quality than standard fragmentation features and/or blastomere uniformity analysis. When choosing among embryos, if nucleic status is identical, then embryos with the least fragmentation should be chosen. Moreover, in blastocyst transfer, a blastocyst whose nuclei were judged normal on day 2 should be selected on day 5 over any other blastocysts.

Key words: implantation rate/IVF/multinucleated blastomere/nuclei counting/selection of embryo


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
L. Scott, A. Finn, T. O'Leary, S. McLellan, and J. Hill
Morphologic parameters of early cleavage-stage embryos that correlate with fetal development and delivery: prospective and applied data for increased pregnancy rates
Hum. Reprod., January 1, 2007; 22(1): 230 - 240.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.