Hum. Reprod. Advance Access originally published online on August 6, 2004
Human Reproduction 2004 19(10):2227-2230; doi:10.1093/humrep/deh439
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Lack of intraindividual variation of unbalanced spermatozoa frequencies from a 46,XY,t(9;22)(q21;q11.2) carrier: Case report
1 Service de Cytogénétique, Cytologie et Biologie de la Reproduction, CHU Morvan, Brest, 2 Laboratoire d'Histologie, Embryologie et Cytogénétique, Faculté de Médecine et des Sciences de la Santé, Université de Bretagne Occidentale, Brest, 3 Service de Biologie de la Reproduction, CHRU Lille and 4 Centre de Génétique Chromosomique, Hôpital Saint Antoine, Lille, France
5 To whom correspondence should be addressed at: Laboratoire de Cytogénétique, Faculté de Médecine et des Sciences de la Santé, Université de Bretagne Occidentale, 22 avenue Camille Desmoulins, CS 93837, F-29238 Brest cedex 3, France. Email: marc.debraekeleer{at}univ-brest.fr
The meiotic segregation pattern of 83 men carrying a balanced reciprocal translocation between two autosomes has already been published. Nevertheless, the question of intraindividual variations has not been addressed yet. A 32-year-old patient was found to be a carrier of a t(9;22)(q21;q11.2) during the investigations for a couple with infertility for 3 years. Two sperm samples were obtained at more than 3 months interval. Both sperm samples were analyzed in triple FISH with the D9Z1 and LSI BCR/ABL ES translocation probes. The frequency of gametes exhibiting a chromosomal imbalance was 45.32% and 42.1% in samples 1 and 2, respectively, with the unbalanced spermatozoa resulting from adjacent 1, adjacent 2, and 3:1 segregation in decreasing frequencies. No statistically significant difference was found between both segregation profiles. Four studies have analyzed the meiotic segregation pattern of translocations within families; they found similar profiles of meiotic segregation in each family, but not between families. This suggests, along with our results, that meiotic segregation is not a random process. More studies on intraindividual variations are necessary to allow a better understanding of the meiotic behaviour of chromosomal rearrangements and the practical interest of studies of this kind.
Key words: FISH/male infertility/meiotic segregation/reciprocal translocation/spermatozoa
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. Vozdova, E. Oracova, V. Horinova, and J. Rubes Sperm fluorescence in situ hybridization study of meiotic segregation and an interchromosomal effect in carriers of t(11;18) Hum. Reprod., March 1, 2008; 23(3): 581 - 588. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Perrin, N. Douet-Guilbert, B. Laudier, M.L. Couet, F. Guerif, D. Royere, M.J. Le Bris, M. De Braekeleer, and F. Morel Meiotic segregation in spermatozoa of a 45,XY,-14,der(18)t(14;18)(q11;p11.3) translocation carrier: A Case Report Hum. Reprod., March 1, 2007; 22(3): 729 - 732. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Wiland, A. T. Midro, B. Panasiuk, and M. Kurpisz The Analysis of Meiotic Segregation Patterns and Aneuploidy in the Spermatozoa of Father and Son With Translocation t(4;5)(p15.1;p12) and the Prediction of the Individual Probability Rate for Unbalanced Progeny at Birth J Androl, March 1, 2007; 28(2): 262 - 272. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||

