Skip Navigation


Hum. Reprod. Advance Access originally published online on August 19, 2004
Human Reproduction 2004 19(11):2439-2441; doi:10.1093/humrep/deh446
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF ) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
19/11/2439    most recent
deh446v1
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (21)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tiitinen, A.
Right arrow Articles by Gissler, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tiitinen, A.
Right arrow Articles by Gissler, M.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Human Reproduction vol. 19 no. 11 © European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology 2004; all rights reserved

What is the most relevant standard of success in assisted reproduction?

The value of cryopreservation on cumulative pregnancy rates per single oocyte retrieval should not be forgotten

A. Tiitinen1,3, C. Hydén-Granskog1 and M. Gissler2

1 Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Helsinki University Central Hospital and 2 STAKES National Research and Development Centre for Welfare and Health, Helsinki, Finland

3 To whom correspondence should be addressed at: Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Helsinki University Central Hospital, PO Box 140, 00029 HUS, Finland. Email: aila.tiitinen{at}hus.fi

The most relevant standard of success in IVF has been discussed widely. An optimal standard should reflect both the risk aspects and the effectiveness of the treatment. The most important parameter for the couple is the ultimate cumulative delivery rate per started cycle. Even if the long-term follow-up of the treatment cycles is difficult in practice, we would stress that more emphasis should be given to embryo freezing, in order to maximize the efficiency of the IVF/ICSI cycles. The contribution of embryo cryopreservation in elective single embryo transfer cycle programmes may result in a cumulative delivery rate of >50%. In Finland, the implementation of single embryo transfer has been possible with good cryopreservation programmes. The effect of this strategy has been seen in a decrease in the proportion of twin deliveries after assisted reproduction, being 13.9% for 2002, as well as a reduction of the proportion of multiple births in the nationwide Medical Birth Registry.

Key words: assisted reproduction technologies/cryopreservation/eSET/standard of success


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Hum ReprodHome page
Z. Veleva, P. Karinen, C. Tomas, J. S. Tapanainen, and H. Martikainen
Elective single embryo transfer with cryopreservation improves the outcome and diminishes the costs of IVF/ICSI
Hum. Reprod., July 1, 2009; 24(7): 1632 - 1639.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Hum ReprodHome page
P.O. Karlstrom and C. Bergh
Reducing the number of embryos transferred in Sweden-impact on delivery and multiple birth rates
Hum. Reprod., August 1, 2007; 22(8): 2202 - 2207.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Hum ReprodHome page
A. N. Andersen, V. Goossens, L. Gianaroli, R. Felberbaum, J. de Mouzon, and K.G. Nygren
Assisted reproductive technology in Europe, 2003. Results generated from European registers by ESHRE
Hum. Reprod., June 1, 2007; 22(6): 1513 - 1525.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Hum ReprodHome page
P. Donoso, W. Verpoest, E.G. Papanikolaou, I. Liebaers, H.M. Fatemi, K. Sermon, C. Staessen, J. Van der Elst, and P. Devroey
Single embryo transfer in preimplantation genetic diagnosis cycles for women <36 years does not reduce delivery rate
Hum. Reprod., April 1, 2007; 22(4): 1021 - 1025.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 JAMAHome page
R. J. Stillman
A 47-Year-Old Woman With Fertility Problems Who Desires a Multiple Pregnancy
JAMA, February 28, 2007; 297(8): 858 - 867.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Hum Reprod UpdateHome page
E.M. Kolibianakis, J. Collins, B.C. Tarlatzis, P. Devroey, K. Diedrich, and G. Griesinger
Among patients treated for IVF with gonadotrophins and GnRH analogues, is the probability of live birth dependent on the type of analogue used? A systematic review and meta-analysis
Hum. Reprod. Update, November 1, 2006; 12(6): 651 - 671.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Hum Reprod UpdateHome page
B.C. Tarlatzis, B.C. Fauser, E.M. Kolibianakis, K. Diedrich, P. Devroey, and , On Behalf of the Brussels GnRH Antagonist Consen
GnRH antagonists in ovarian stimulation for IVF
Hum. Reprod. Update, July 1, 2006; 12(4): 333 - 340.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Hum Reprod UpdateHome page
A. Pinborg
IVF/ICSI twin pregnancies: risks and prevention
Hum. Reprod. Update, November 1, 2005; 11(6): 575 - 593.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Hum ReprodHome page
C. Hyden-Granskog, L. Unkila-Kallio, M. Halttunen, and A. Tiitinen
Single embryo transfer is an option in frozen embryo transfer
Hum. Reprod., October 1, 2005; 20(10): 2935 - 2938.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Hum ReprodHome page
C. Bergh
Single embryo transfer: a mini-review
Hum. Reprod., February 1, 2005; 20(2): 323 - 327.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.