Skip Navigation


Hum. Reprod. Advance Access originally published online on August 19, 2004
Human Reproduction 2004 19(11):2529-2536; doi:10.1093/humrep/deh474
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF ) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
19/11/2529    most recent
deh474v2
deh474v1
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (8)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pinborg, A.
Right arrow Articles by Nyboe Andersen, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Pinborg, A.
Right arrow Articles by Nyboe Andersen, A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Human Reproduction vol. 19 no. 11 © European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology 2004; all rights reserved

Hospital care utilization of IVF/ICSI twins followed until 2–7 years of age: a controlled Danish national cohort study

Anja Pinborg1,2, Anne Loft1, Steen Rasmussen3 and Anders Nyboe Andersen1

1 The Fertility Clinic, University of Copenhagen, Rigshospitalet, 3 National Board of Health, Health Statistics, Copenhagen, Denmark

2 To whom correspondence should be addressed: The Fertility Clinic, University of Copenhagen, Rigshopitalet, Blegdamsvej 9, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark. Email: apinborg{at}rh.dk

BACKGROUND: IVF/ICSI twins are likely to have a higher risk of prematurity associated with higher morbidity. The aim of this study was to assess the use of hospital care resources in IVF/ICSI twins on data retrieved until 2–7 years of child age. METHODS: National controlled cohort study on hospital admissions and surgical interventions in 3393 IVF twins, 10 239 spontaneously conceived twins and 5130 IVF singletons born between 1995 and 2000 in Denmark. Cross-linkage of data from the Danish IVF Registry and the National Patient Registry enabled us to identify children who were admitted to hospital or underwent an operation. RESULTS: The frequency of hospitalized children was 69.8, 69.6 and 49.8%, and of children who underwent a surgical intervention 10.6, 11.2 and 8.5% in IVF/ICSI twins, control twins and IVF/ICSI singletons respectively. Odds ratios (OR) (95% confidence intervals) of hospitalization in IVF/ICSI twins versus control twins and IVF/ICSI singletons were 1.04 (0.96, 1.14) and 2.44 (2.22, 2.63) and OR adjusted for year of birth, maternal age and parity were 1.00 (0.91, 1.11) and 2.38 (2.17, 2.63) respectively. Also for term birth infants, IVF/ICSI twins were more likely to be hospitalized than IVF/ICSI singletons: adjusted OR 1.37 (1.22, 1.51). Similar risk of a surgical procedure was observed in IVF/ICSI versus control twins. However, IVF/ICSI twins more often underwent a surgical intervention than IVF/ICSI singletons: adjusted OR 1.26 (1.08, 1.47). This risk disappeared when restricted to term infants: adjusted OR 1.00 (0.81, 1.22). Different sex IVF/ICSI and control twins had equal risk of admissions and surgical interventions, and ICSI children had the same risk as children born after conventional IVF. CONCLUSIONS: Though the use of hospital care resources was similar in IVF/ICSI and control twins, the over-use in IVF/ICSI twins versus IVF/ICSI singletons adds to the arguments for implementing elective single embryo transfer as our standard procedure.

Key words: epidemiology/hospital admission/hospital care resources/ICSI twins/IVF/surgical procedures


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
Z. Veleva, P. Karinen, C. Tomas, J. S. Tapanainen, and H. Martikainen
Elective single embryo transfer with cryopreservation improves the outcome and diminishes the costs of IVF/ICSI
Hum. Reprod., July 1, 2009; 24(7): 1632 - 1639.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
M. Hansen, L. Colvin, B. Petterson, J. J. Kurinczuk, N. de Klerk, and C. Bower
Twins born following assisted reproductive technology: perinatal outcome and admission to hospital
Hum. Reprod., May 20, 2009; (2009) dep173v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum Reprod UpdateHome page
S. Vitthala, T.A. Gelbaya, D.R. Brison, C.T. Fitzgerald, and L.G. Nardo
The risk of monozygotic twins after assisted reproductive technology: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Hum. Reprod. Update, January 1, 2009; 15(1): 45 - 55.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Pediatr PsycholHome page
L. Goldbeck, F. Gagsteiger, I. Mindermann, S. Strobele, and Y. Izat
Cognitive Development of Singletons Conceived by Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection or In vitro Fertilization at Age 5 and 10 years
J. Pediatr. Psychol., November 26, 2008; (2008) jsn120v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
S. Koivurova, A.-L. Hartikainen, M. Gissler, E. Hemminki, and M.-R. Jarvelin
Post-neonatal hospitalization and health care costs among IVF children: a 7-year follow-up study
Hum. Reprod., August 1, 2007; 22(8): 2136 - 2141.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PediatricsHome page
R. Klemetti, T. Sevon, M. Gissler, and E. Hemminki
Health of Children Born as a Result of In Vitro Fertilization
Pediatrics, November 1, 2006; 118(5): 1819 - 1827.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum Reprod UpdateHome page
A. Pinborg
IVF/ICSI twin pregnancies: risks and prevention
Hum. Reprod. Update, November 1, 2005; 11(6): 575 - 593.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.