Skip Navigation


Hum. Reprod. Advance Access originally published online on October 7, 2004
Human Reproduction 2004 19(11):2545-2549; doi:10.1093/humrep/deh452
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF ) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
19/11/2545    most recent
deh452v1
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (19)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kolibianakis, E.
Right arrow Articles by Devroey, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kolibianakis, E.
Right arrow Articles by Devroey, P.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Human Reproduction vol. 19 no. 11 © European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology 2004; all rights reserved

Modified natural cycle for IVF does not offer a realistic chance of parenthood in poor responders with high day 3 FSH levels, as a last resort prior to oocyte donation

Efstratios Kolibianakis1, Kostantinos Zikopoulos, Michel Camus, Herman Tournaye, André Van Steirteghem and Paul Devroey

Center for Reproductive Medicine, Dutch-Speaking Brussels Free University, Laarbeeklaan 101, B-1090, Brussels, Belgium

1 To whom correspondence should be addressed. Email: stratis{at}easynet.be

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the use of the modified natural cycle (MNC) for IVF in poor responders as a last resort prior to oocyte donation. METHODS: Thirty-two patients with a regular menstrual cycle, FSH levels on day 3 of the cycle >12 IU/l and one or more failed IVF cycles with five or fewer cumulus–oocyte complexes (COCs) retrieved were included in this prospective study. Recombinant FSH 100 IU and GnRH antagonist 0.25 mg/day were started concomitantly when a follicle with a mean diameter of 14 mm was present at ultrasound. HCG 10 000 IU was administered as soon as the mean follicular diameter was ≥16 mm. RESULTS: Twenty-five out of 78 cycles performed (32.1%) did not result in oocyte retrieval. In nine out of 53 cycles (16.9%) in which oocyte retrieval was performed, no COCs were retrieved. Following fertilization, embryo transfer was performed in 19 out of 44 cycles in which COCs were retrieved (43.2%). No ongoing pregnancy was achieved in 78 MNCs (0.0%; 95% confidence interval 0.0–4.7). CONCLUSIONS: MNC does not offer a realistic chance of parenthood in patients with high levels of FSH on day 3 of the cycle and previous poor response to ovarian stimulation, when offered as a last resort prior to oocyte donation.

Key words: GnRH antagonists/modified natural cycle/poor responders


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
M.J. Pelinck, H.M. Knol, N.E.A. Vogel, E.G.J.M. Arts, A.H.M. Simons, M.J. Heineman, and A. Hoek
Cumulative pregnancy rates after sequential treatment with modified natural cycle IVF followed by IVF with controlled ovarian stimulation
Hum. Reprod., August 1, 2008; 23(8): 1808 - 1814.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
M.J. Pelinck, N.E.A. Vogel, E.G.J.M. Arts, A.H.M. Simons, M.J. Heineman, and A. Hoek
Cumulative pregnancy rates after a maximum of nine cycles of modified natural cycle IVF and analysis of patient drop-out: a cohort study
Hum. Reprod., September 1, 2007; 22(9): 2463 - 2470.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
S. M. Nelson, R. W. Yates, and R. Fleming
Serum anti-Mullerian hormone and FSH: prediction of live birth and extremes of response in stimulated cycles implications for individualization of therapy
Hum. Reprod., September 1, 2007; 22(9): 2414 - 2421.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci.Home page
S. BAKA, E. MAKRAKIS, D. TZANAKAKI, S. KONIDARIS, D. HASSIAKOS, T. MOUSTAKARIAS, and G. CREATSAS
Poor Responders in IVF: Cancellation of a First Cycle Is Not Predictive of a Subsequent Failure
Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci., December 1, 2006; 1092(1): 418 - 425.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
M.J. Pelinck, N.E.A. Vogel, A. Hoek, A.H.M. Simons, E.G.J.M. Arts, M.H. Mochtar, S. Beemsterboer, M.N. Hondelink, and M.J. Heineman
Cumulative pregnancy rates after three cycles of minimal stimulation IVF and results according to subfertility diagnosis: a multicentre cohort study
Hum. Reprod., September 1, 2006; 21(9): 2375 - 2383.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum Reprod UpdateHome page
B.C. Tarlatzis, B.C. Fauser, E.M. Kolibianakis, K. Diedrich, P. Devroey, and , On Behalf of the Brussels GnRH Antagonist Consen
GnRH antagonists in ovarian stimulation for IVF
Hum. Reprod. Update, July 1, 2006; 12(4): 333 - 340.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
J. H. Check
Modified natural cycle IVF for poor responders
Hum. Reprod., September 1, 2005; 20(9): 2661 - 2661.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
E. M Kolibianakis and P. Devroey
Reply: Modified natural cycle IVF for poor responders
Hum. Reprod., September 1, 2005; 20(9): 2661 - 2662.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
B. Friden, J. Hreinsson, and O. Hovatta
Birth of a healthy infant after in vitro oocyte maturation and ICSI in a woman with diminished ovarian response: Case report
Hum. Reprod., September 1, 2005; 20(9): 2556 - 2558.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum Reprod UpdateHome page
J. M.R. Gerris
Single embryo transfer and IVF/ICSI outcome: a balanced appraisal
Hum. Reprod. Update, March 1, 2005; 11(2): 105 - 121.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.