Skip Navigation


Hum. Reprod. Advance Access originally published online on October 15, 2004
Human Reproduction 2004 19(12):2702-2710; doi:10.1093/humrep/deh538
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF ) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
19/12/2702    most recent
deh538v1
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (7)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bahadur, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bahadur, G.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Human Reproduction vol. 19 no. 12 © European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology 2004; all rights reserved

Ethics of testicular stem cell medicine

G. Bahadur

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Fertility and Reproductive Medicine Laboratories, Royal Free and University College Medical School, 25 Grafton Way, London WC1E 6DB, UK

Email: gulam.bahadur{at}uclh.org

The ethical issues raised by advances in reproductive technology allowing the transplantation of testicular stem cells to enable infertile men and cancer patients, including the pre-pubertal, to have children, and to provide new contraceptive prospects for fertile men are discussed. Consideration of respect for the patient's autonomy, the need for informed consent and the health of any offspring resulting from such a procedure are included. Topics covered include: the problems raised by cases needing consent for the transplantation of testicular stem cells from pre-pubertal and adolescent patients; the legal status of stem cells; the arguements for treating such tissue as property which might serve as a means of guaranteeing respect for patients' rights in disputed cases; aspects of patents and the ethics of allowing commercial traffic of such material; questions relating to health and safety, as well as xenotransplantation technology in humans; and posthumous procurement use of germ cells from minors. Proposals are made to enhance informed and effective consent, while supporting patient determination, choice, autonomy and technological advances. The paper appeals to the emerging EU directives in relation to tissue procurement, storing and use of tissue and cells to adopt a pragmatic and meaningful position which will help enhance patient determination and autonomy in relation to the emerging technologies in reproductive medicine, whilst providing a pragmatic way forward for fertility clinics and laboratories to function.

Key words: assisted reproduction/cancer patients/ethics/risks/safety/testicular stem cells


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Hum Reprod UpdateHome page
M. Geens, E. Goossens, G. De Block, L. Ning, D. Van Saen, and H. Tournaye
Autologous spermatogonial stem cell transplantation in man: current obstacles for a future clinical application
Hum. Reprod. Update, March 1, 2008; 14(2): 121 - 130.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Hum ReprodHome page
V. Keros, K. Hultenby, B. Borgstrom, M. Fridstrom, K. Jahnukainen, and O. Hovatta
Methods of cryopreservation of testicular tissue with viable spermatogonia in pre-pubertal boys undergoing gonadotoxic cancer treatment
Hum. Reprod., May 1, 2007; 22(5): 1384 - 1395.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Hum ReprodHome page
M. Geens, H. Van de Velde, G. De Block, E. Goossens, A. Van Steirteghem, and H. Tournaye
The efficiency of magnetic-activated cell sorting and fluorescence-activated cell sorting in the decontamination of testicular cell suspensions in cancer patients
Hum. Reprod., March 1, 2007; 22(3): 733 - 742.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 JCOHome page
S. J. Lee, L. R. Schover, A. H. Partridge, P. Patrizio, W. H. Wallace, K. Hagerty, L. N. Beck, L. V. Brennan, and K. Oktay
American Society of Clinical Oncology Recommendations on Fertility Preservation in Cancer Patients
J. Clin. Oncol., June 20, 2006; 24(18): 2917 - 2931.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Hum ReprodHome page
G. Bahadur, O. Ozturk, A. Muneer, R. Wafa, A. Ashraf, N. Jaman, S. Patel, A.W. Oyede, and D.J. Ralph
Semen quality before and after gonadotoxic treatment
Hum. Reprod., March 1, 2005; 20(3): 774 - 781.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.