Hum. Reprod. Advance Access originally published online on April 29, 2004
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Human Reproduction, Vol. 19, No. 6, 1401-1408,
June 2004
© 2004 European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology
The predictive value of sperm chromatin structure assay (SCSA) parameters for the outcome of intrauterine insemination, IVF and ICSI
1 Fertility Clinic, Viborg Hospital (Skive), Resenvej 25, DK 7800 Skive, Denmark, 2 Section of Toxicology and Biomedical Sciences, BIOTEC-MED, ENEA Casaccia Research Center, Rome, Italy and 3 Fertility Centre, Scanian Andrology Centre, Malmö University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden
4 To whom correspondence should be addressed. e-mail: mona.bungum{at}sygehusviborg.dk
INTRODUCTION: Sperm chromatin integrity assessment has been suggested as a fertility predictor. The aim of this study was to examine the relationship between the results of sperm chromatin structure assay (SCSA) and the outcome of IVF, ICSI and intrauterine insemination (IUI). METHODS: A total of 306 consecutive couples undergoing assisted reproduction were included. IUI was performed in 131, IVF in 109 and ICSI in 66. SCSA results were expressed as DNA fractionation index (DFI) and highly DNA stainable (HDS) cell fractions. Reproductive outcome parameters were biochemical pregnancy (BP), clinical pregnancy (CP) and delivery (D). RESULTS: For IUI, the chance of pregnancy/delivery was significantly higher in the group with DFI
27% and HDS
10% than in patients with DFI >27% or HDS >10%. The odds ratios (ORs) (95% confidence intervals) were 20 (2.3117), 16 (1.9137) and 14 (1.6110) for BP, CP and D, respectively. No statistical difference between the outcomes of IVF versus ICSI was observed in the group with DFI
27%. In the DFI >27% group, however, the results of ICSI were significantly better than those of IVF. Comparing ICSI with IVF, the OR (95% CI) for BP was 26 (1.9350). CONCLUSIONS: SCSA is a useful method for prediction of the outcome of assisted reproduction.
Key words: ART/DNA damage/pregnancy rate/sperm chromatin
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. P. M. Sousa, R. S. Tavares, J. F. V. de la Calle, H. Figueiredo, V. Almeida, T. Almeida-Santos, and J. Ramalho-Santos Dual use of Diff-Quik-like stains for the simultaneous evaluation of human sperm morphology and chromatin status Hum. Reprod., October 3, 2008; (2008) den365v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Zini, J. M. Boman, E. Belzile, and A. Ciampi Sperm DNA damage is associated with an increased risk of pregnancy loss after IVF and ICSI: systematic review and meta-analysis Hum. Reprod., August 29, 2008; (2008) den321v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. E. M. Lewis and I. M. Agbaje Using the alkaline comet assay in prognostic tests for male infertility and assisted reproductive technology outcomes Mutagenesis, May 1, 2008; 23(3): 163 - 170. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. M. Said, A. Agarwal, M. Zborowski, S. Grunewald, H.-J. Glander, and U. Paasch Utility of Magnetic Cell Separation as a Molecular Sperm Preparation Technique J Androl, March 1, 2008; 29(2): 134 - 142. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Bungum, M. Spano, P. Humaidan, P. Eleuteri, M. Rescia, and A. Giwercman Sperm chromatin structure assay parameters measured after density gradient centrifugation are not predictive for the outcome of ART Hum. Reprod., January 1, 2008; 23(1): 4 - 10. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Perez-Crespo, P. Moreira, B. Pintado, and A. Gutierrez-Adan Factors From Damaged Sperm Affect Its DNA Integrity and Its Ability to Promote Embryo Implantation in Mice J Androl, January 1, 2008; 29(1): 47 - 54. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. L. Brackett, E. Ibrahim, J. A. Grotas, T. C. Aballa, and C. M. Lynne Higher Sperm DNA Damage in Semen From Men With Spinal Cord Injuries Compared With Controls J Androl, January 1, 2008; 29(1): 93 - 99. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. D. van Beek, M. Smit, M. M. van den Heuvel-Eibrink, F. H. de Jong, F. G. Hakvoort-Cammel, C. van den Bos, H. van den Berg, R. F.A. Weber, R. Pieters, and S. M.P.F. de Muinck Keizer-Schrama Inhibin B is superior to FSH as a serum marker for spermatogenesis in men treated for Hodgkin's lymphoma with chemotherapy during childhood Hum. Reprod., December 1, 2007; 22(12): 3215 - 3222. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D.Y. Liu and H.W.G. Baker Human sperm bound to the zona pellucida have normal nuclear chromatin as assessed by acridine orange fluorescence Hum. Reprod., June 1, 2007; 22(6): 1597 - 1602. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Lefievre, K. Bedu-Addo, S. J Conner, G. S M Machado-Oliveira, Y. Chen, J. C Kirkman-Brown, M. A Afnan, S. J Publicover, W C. L Ford, and C. L R Barratt Counting sperm does not add up any more: time for a new equation? Reproduction, April 1, 2007; 133(4): 675 - 684. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Muriel, V. Goyanes, E. Segrelles, J. Gosalvez, J. G. Alvarez, and J. L. Fernandez Increased Aneuploidy Rate in Sperm With Fragmented DNA as Determined by the Sperm Chromatin Dispersion (SCD) Test and FISH Analysis J Androl, January 1, 2007; 28(1): 38 - 49. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Bungum, P. Humaidan, A. Axmon, M. Spano, L. Bungum, J. Erenpreiss, and A. Giwercman Sperm DNA integrity assessment in prediction of assisted reproduction technology outcome Hum. Reprod., January 1, 2007; 22(1): 174 - 179. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
O. Stahl, J. Eberhard, K. Jepson, M. Spano, M. Cwikiel, E. Cavallin-Stahl, and A. Giwercman Sperm DNA integrity in testicular cancer patients Hum. Reprod., December 1, 2006; 21(12): 3199 - 3205. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Zini and J. Libman Sperm DNA damage: clinical significance in the era of assisted reproduction. Can. Med. Assoc. J., August 29, 2006; 175(5): 495 - 500. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Erenpreiss, M. Bungum, M. Spano, S. Elzanaty, J. Orbidans, and A. Giwercman Intra-individual variation in sperm chromatin structure assay parameters in men from infertile couples: clinical implications Hum. Reprod., August 1, 2006; 21(8): 2061 - 2064. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. J. Wyrobek, B. Eskenazi, S. Young, N. Arnheim, I. Tiemann-Boege, E. W. Jabs, R. L. Glaser, F. S. Pearson, and D. Evenson Advancing age has differential effects on DNA damage, chromatin integrity, gene mutations, and aneuploidies in sperm PNAS, June 20, 2006; 103(25): 9601 - 9606. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. B. Boe-Hansen, J. Fedder, A. K. Ersboll, and P. Christensen The sperm chromatin structure assay as a diagnostic tool in the human fertility clinic Hum. Reprod., June 1, 2006; 21(6): 1576 - 1582. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. I. Kort, J. B. Massey, C. W. Elsner, D. Mitchell-Leef, D. B. Shapiro, M. A. Witt, and W. E. Roudebush Impact of Body Mass Index Values on Sperm Quantity and Quality J Androl, May 1, 2006; 27(3): 450 - 452. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. A. Makhlouf and C. Niederberger DNA Integrity Tests in Clinical Practice: It Is Not a Simple Matter of Black and White (or Red and Green) J Androl, May 1, 2006; 27(3): 316 - 323. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
X. Zhang, M. S. Gabriel, and A. Zini Sperm Nuclear Histone to Protamine Ratio in Fertile and Infertile Men: Evidence of Heterogeneous Subpopulations of Spermatozoa in the Ejaculate J Androl, May 1, 2006; 27(3): 414 - 420. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Smith, H. Kaune, D. Parodi, M. Madariaga, R. Rios, I. Morales, and A. Castro Increased sperm DNA damage in patients with varicocele: relationship with seminal oxidative stress Hum. Reprod., April 1, 2006; 21(4): 986 - 993. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Muriel, M. Meseguer, J. L. Fernandez, J. Alvarez, J. Remohi, A. Pellicer, and N. Garrido Value of the sperm chromatin dispersion test in predicting pregnancy outcome in intrauterine insemination: a blind prospective study Hum. Reprod., March 1, 2006; 21(3): 738 - 744. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Said, A. Agarwal, S. Grunewald, M. Rasch, T. Baumann, C. Kriegel, L. Li, H.-J. Glander, A. J. Thomas Jr., and U. Paasch Selection of Nonapoptotic Spermatozoa As a New Tool for Enhancing Assisted Reproduction Outcomes: An In Vitro Model Biol Reprod, March 1, 2006; 74(3): 530 - 537. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Evenson Reply to: 'The predictive value of the sperm chromatin structure assay (SCSA)'--a response from the SCSA inventor. Hum. Reprod., February 1, 2006; 21(2): 570 - 572. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Bungum, L. Bungum, and P. Humaidan A prospective study, using sibling oocytes, examining the effect of 30 seconds versus 90 minutes gamete co-incubation in IVF Hum. Reprod., February 1, 2006; 21(2): 518 - 523. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Zini, J. Meriano, K. Kader, K. Jarvi, C. A. Laskin, and K. Cadesky Potential adverse effect of sperm DNA damage on embryo quality after ICSI Hum. Reprod., December 1, 2005; 20(12): 3476 - 3480. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Sergerie, G. Laforest, L. Bujan, F. Bissonnette, and G. Bleau Sperm DNA fragmentation: threshold value in male fertility Hum. Reprod., December 1, 2005; 20(12): 3446 - 3451. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Spano, G. Toft, L. Hagmar, P. Eleuteri, M. Rescia, A. Rignell-Hydbom, E. Tyrkiel, V. Zvyezday, J.P. Bonde, and INUENDO Exposure to PCB and p, p'-DDE in European and Inuit populations: impact on human sperm chromatin integrity Hum. Reprod., December 1, 2005; 20(12): 3488 - 3499. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. W. Aoki, S. I. Moskovtsev, J. Willis, L. Liu, J. B. M. Mullen, and D. T. Carrell DNA Integrity Is Compromised in Protamine-Deficient Human Sperm J Androl, November 1, 2005; 26(6): 741 - 748. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R.-M. Laberge and G. Boissonneault On the Nature and Origin of DNA Strand Breaks in Elongating Spermatids Biol Reprod, August 1, 2005; 73(2): 289 - 296. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Nicopoullos, C. Gilling-Smith, P. Almeida, and J. Ramsay The predictive value of sperm chromatin structure assay Hum. Reprod., March 1, 2005; 20(3): 839 - 839. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Bungum Reply to: sperm chromatin structural assay versus hypo-osmotic swelling test in predicting the need for in vitro fertilization with intracytoplasmic sperm injection Hum. Reprod., March 1, 2005; 20(3): 841 - 842. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Gandini Reply to: sperm chromatin structural assay versus hypo-osmotic swelling test in predicting the need for in vitro fertilization with intracytoplasmic sperm injection Hum. Reprod., March 1, 2005; 20(3): 842 - 843. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Bungum Reply to: the predictive value of sperm chromatin structure assay Hum. Reprod., March 1, 2005; 20(3): 839 - 840. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||






