Skip Navigation


Hum. Reprod. Advance Access originally published online on July 8, 2004
Human Reproduction 2004 19(9):1952-1956; doi:10.1093/humrep/deh360
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF ) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
19/9/1952    most recent
deh360v1
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (3)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Landau, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Landau, R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Human Reproduction vol. 19 no. 9 © European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology 2004; all rights reserved

Posthumous sperm retrieval for the purpose of later insemination or IVF in Israel: an ethical and psychosocial critique

R. Landau

Paul Baerwald School of Social Work and Social Welfare, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Mount Scopus, Jerusalem 91905, Israel

Email: mslanda{at}pluto.mscc.huji.ac.il

In October 2003, the Attorney General of the Government of Israel published guidelines allowing posthumous sperm retrieval for the purpose of later insemination or IVF by the surviving female partner. This paper presents an ethical and psycho-social critique of the guidelines, which challenges their basic premise that personal autonomy over-rides any other ethical principle and argues that the autonomy of the adult should not over-ride the well-being of the offspring. It also shows that, despite the centrality of autonomy in the guidelines, they actually infringe on the autonomy of the deceased, and pose challenges to that of the surviving partner. It questions the propriety and very possibility of ascertaining the ‘presumed wishes’ of the deceased for a posthumous child. Finally, it argues against the document's presentation of posthumous sperm retrieval as a medical procedure and contends that, on the contrary, medicine and science are suborned to the exploitation of the dead.

Key words: ethics/Israel/posthumous sperm retrieval


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.