Skip Navigation


Hum. Reprod. Advance Access originally published online on July 8, 2004
Human Reproduction 2004 19(9):2097-2102; doi:10.1093/humrep/deh398
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF ) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
19/9/2097    most recent
deh398v1
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (9)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schwärzler, P.
Right arrow Articles by Zech, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Schwärzler, P.
Right arrow Articles by Zech, N.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Human Reproduction vol. 19 no. 9 © European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology 2004; all rights reserved

Pregnancy outcome after blastocyst transfer as compared to early cleavage stage embryo transfer

Peter Schwärzler1,4, Herbert Zech2, Margherita Auer1, Karin Pfau1, Georg Göbel3, Pierre Vanderzwalmen2 and Nicolas Zech2

1 Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, 2 Institute for Reproductive Medicine and Endocrinology, Bregenz and 3 Institute for Biostatistics and Documentation, University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria

4 To whom corresondence should be addressed at: Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Innsbruck, Anichstrasse 35, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria. Tel: +43 512 504 3051; Fax: +43 512 504 3055; Email: peter.schwarzler{at}uibk.ac.at

BACKGROUND: Retrospective cohort study to evaluate differences in outcome when embryo transfer was performed either on day 2–3 (cleavage stage, CS-group) or on day 4–5 (blastocyst stage, BS-group). METHODS: A total of 1259 consecutive cycles yielding 500 live born babies performed at a single centre in Bregenz, Austria, were included. Main outcome measures were implantation and (multiple) pregnancy rates and neonatal outcome including birth defects. RESULTS: Total Pregnancy rate was 44% vs 28% (P<0.001) and the total ‘take home baby rate’ was 37% vs 22% in the BS-group and the CS-group, respectively. Rate of multiple gestations (34% vs 17%, P=0.001) was significantly higher among the BS-group, resulting in a higher rate of preterm deliveries <36 weeks (26% vs 17%, P=0.045). Female factor causing infertility (40% vs 21%, P<0.001) was significantly higher among the BS-group. For the CS-group, rate of singleton pregnancies (83% vs 66%, P=0.001) and idiopathic cause of infertility (34% vs 22%, P=0.012) were significantly higher. No statistically significant differences were found in sex, Caesarean section rate, Apgar score and umbilical artery pH-values, total mean birth weight, admission rate to intensive care unit, days of hospitalization and number of minor and major birth defects. CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that blastocyst transfer may lead to a higher pregnancy rate with an overall better take-home baby rate (THBR) at the cost of higher rates of multiples and preterm deliveries.

Key words: ART/birth defect/blastocyst transfer/early cleavage stage/pregnancy outcome


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
M. Montag and H. van der Ven
Pregnancy outcome after blastocyst transfer as compared to early cleavage stage embryo transfer
Hum. Reprod., June 1, 2005; 20(6): 1746 - 1747.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.