Skip Navigation


Hum. Reprod. Advance Access originally published online on August 26, 2005
Human Reproduction 2005 20(12):3395-3401; doi:10.1093/humrep/dei252
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF ) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
20/12/3395    most recent
dei252v1
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (8)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gutiérrez-Mateo, C.
Right arrow Articles by Navarro, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gutiérrez-Mateo, C.
Right arrow Articles by Navarro, J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2005. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oupjournals.org

Karyotyping of human oocytes by cenM-FISH, a new 24-colour centromere-specific technique

C. Gutiérrez-Mateo1,5, J. Benet1, H. Starke2, M. Oliver-Bonet1, S. Munné3,4, T. Liehr2 and J. Navarro1,5

1 Departament de Biologia Cel·lular, Fisiologia i Immunologia, Unitat de Biologia Cel·lular i Genètica Mèdica, Facultat de Medicina, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, E-08193 Bellaterra, Spain, 2 Institute of Human Genetics and Anthropology, 07740 Jena, Germany, 3 The Institute for Reproductive Medicine and Science, St Barnabas Medical Center, 94 Old Short Hills Road, Livingston, NJ 07039, USA and 4 Reprogenetics, 101 Old Short Hills Road, Suite 501, West Orange, NJ 07052, USA

5 To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: cristina.gutierrez{at}uab.es; joaquima.navarro{at}uab.es

BACKGROUND: Metaphase II (MII) chromosome complements are difficult to karyotype. The objective of this study was to investigate the efficiency and limitations of centromere-specific multiplex fluorescence in situ hybridization (cenM-FISH), a new 24 colour FISH technique using centromere-specific probes, to analyse the whole chromosome complement within human oocytes. METHODS: Oocytes were donated by 34 patients undergoing ovarian stimulation and IVF. The MII oocytes were analysed by means of cenM-FISH, while the confirmation of results was performed by FISH and/or by analysing the corresponding first polar bodies using comparative genomic hybridization (CGH). RESULTS: A total of 30 cells, corresponding to 16 oocytes and 14 first polar bodies, were successfully karyotyped by either cenM-FISH or CGH. The incidence of aneuploidy was 25%, and eight out of nine aneuploidy events were confirmed by CGH and FISH. CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrate here for the first time that the identification of any numerical abnormality in oocytes is feasible using cenM-FISH. Despite the fact that the fixation efficiency remains low, the present results confirm the advantage of analysing the whole set of chromosomes to make an accurate estimation of the aneuploidy rate in human oocytes.

Key words: aneuploidy/cenM-FISH/CGH/first polar body/oocyte


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
L. Uroz, T. Liehr, K. Mrasek, and C. Templado
Centromere-specific multicolour fluorescence in situ hybridization on human spermatocyte I and II metaphases
Hum. Reprod., April 20, 2009; (2009) dep092v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.