Hum. Reprod. Advance Access originally published online on December 9, 2004
Human Reproduction 2005 20(2):514-520; doi:10.1093/humrep/deh651
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Clinical evaluation of a viscoelastic gel for reduction of adhesions following gynaecological surgery by laparoscopy in Europe
1 Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Viborg Hospital, Viborg, Denmark, 2 Université Catholique de Louvain, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Brussels, Belgium, 3 Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Klinikum Duisburg, Zuden Rehwiesen 9, Duisburg, Germany, 4 Institut Greenblatt France, Bordeaux, France, 5 FzioMed Inc., 231 Bonetti Drive, San Luis Obispo, California, and 6 Obstetrics and Gynecology, Livingston Reproductive Biology Laboratories, KeckUSC School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California, USA
7 To whom correspondence should be sent at: University of Southern California Keck School of Medicine, Obstetrics and Gynecology, Livingston Laboratories, 1321 N. Mission Road, Los Angeles, CA 90033, USA. Email: gsd1270{at}aol.com
BACKGROUND: Commonly used adhesion prevention devices either cannot be applied or are difficult to use via laparoscopy. A viscoelastic gel was developed specifically for adhesion prophylaxis during minimally invasive surgery. METHODS: Randomized, third party-blinded, parallel-group design conducted at four centres. Patients (1846 years old) underwent laparoscopic surgery with second look 610 weeks later. Viscoelastic gel coated adnexa and adjacent tissues. Blinded reviews of videotapes were quantified by American Fertility Society (AFS) adhesion scores. RESULTS: In 25 treatment patients, surgery was performed on 45 adnexa. Coverage of surgical sites at risk for adhesions was typically accomplished with
15 ml of viscoelastic gel which was delivered in
90 s. In 24 control patients, surgery alone was performed on 41 adnexa. Treated adnexa showed a decrease in AFS score (11.99.1). In contrast, control adnexa showed an increase in AFS score (8.815.8). This difference in second-look AFS scores (42% reduction) is significant (P<0.01). Ninety-three per cent of treated adnexa did not have a worse adhesion score in contrast to 56% of control adnexa. Combining scores into prognostic categories also show significant treatment effect of the viscoelastic gel (P<0.01). CONCLUSION: Viscoelastic gel was easy to use via laparoscopy and produced significant reduction in adnexal adhesions. It provides benefits to patients undergoing gynaecological surgery.
Key words: adhesions/laparoscopy/Oxiplex/prophylaxis/viscoelastic gel
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
C. Nappi, A. Di Spiezio Sardo, E. Greco, M. Guida, S. Bettocchi, and G. Bifulco Prevention of adhesions in gynaecological endoscopy Hum. Reprod. Update, July 1, 2007; 13(4): 379 - 394. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. Mais, G.L. Bracco, P. Litta, T. Gargiulo, and G.B. Melis Reduction of postoperative adhesions with an auto-crosslinked hyaluronan gel in gynaecological laparoscopic surgery: a blinded, controlled, randomized, multicentre study Hum. Reprod., May 1, 2006; 21(5): 1248 - 1254. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||

