Hum. Reprod. Advance Access originally published online on December 23, 2004
Human Reproduction 2005 20(3):583-587; doi:10.1093/humrep/deh662
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Human Reproduction Vol. 20 No. 3 © The Author 2004; all rights reserved
The epigenetic environment: secondary sex ratio depends on differential survival in embryogenesis
Brody School of Medicine, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC 27858-4354, USA
1 Email:boklagec{at}mail.ecu.edu
Live human births are usually more than half male, in spite of excess losses of males throughout fetal development. These observations together demand an excess of males near the beginning of pregnancy greater than that seen at birth. Reductions of the usual excess of males among human live births have widely been considered to represent consequences of untoward circumstances surrounding conception. Repeated competent research efforts have found no evidence for any bias in gametogenesis or fertilization in favour of Y-bearing sperm. Male embryogenesis is faster and more efficient, leaving females in excess among failures before the fetal period. Sex differences in speed and efficiency of embryogenesis, dependent for example on epigenetic differences such as genomic imprinting, produce an excess of males at the transition from embryogenesis to clinical pregnancy, that will survive the male excess of losses throughout the fetal period, to yield an excess of males among live births. Changes in, or mediated by, the epigenetic environment of embryogenesis provide the most plausible prospects for causes of changes in secondary sex ratio.
Key words: fertilization/gamete/imprinting/sex ratio
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  A.S. Khashan, P.B. Mortensen, R. McNamee, P.N. Baker, and K.M. Abel Sex ratio at birth following prenatal maternal exposure to severe life events: a population-based cohort study Hum. Reprod., July 1, 2009; 24(7): 1754 - 1757. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. E. Boklage Traces of embryogenesis are the same in monozygotic and dizygotic twins: not compatible with double ovulation Hum. Reprod., June 1, 2009; 24(6): 1255 - 1266. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 W. G. Foster Environmental Estrogens and Endocrine Disruption: Importance of Comparative Endocrinology Endocrinology, September 1, 2008; 149(9): 4267 - 4268. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 V.J. Grant, R.J. Irwin, N.T. Standley, A.N. Shelling, and L.W. Chamley Sex of Bovine Embryos May Be Related to Mothers' Preovulatory Follicular Testosterone Biol Reprod, May 1, 2008; 78(5): 812 - 815. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. Fedder, A. Gabrielsen, P. Humaidan, K. Erb, E. Ernst, and A. Loft Malformation rate and sex ratio in 412 children conceived with epididymal or testicular sperm Hum. Reprod., April 1, 2007; 22(4): 1080 - 1085. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. P. E. Bonde and A. Wilcox Ratio of boys to girls at birth BMJ, March 10, 2007; 334(7592): 486 - 487. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
W. H. James Are there preconceptional determinants of mammalian sex? A response to Boklage (2005) Hum. Reprod., October 1, 2006; 21(10): 2486 - 2490. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. E. Boklage Embryogenesis of chimeras, twins and anterior midline asymmetries Hum. Reprod., March 1, 2006; 21(3): 579 - 591. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. Gutierrez-Adan The epigenetic environment: secondary sex ratio depends on differential survival in embryogenesis: Comment 1 Hum. Reprod., September 1, 2005; 20(9): 2662 - 2663. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
P.H. Jongbloet The epigenetic environment: secondary sex ratio depends on differential survival in embryogenesis: Comment 2 Hum. Reprod., September 1, 2005; 20(9): 2663 - 2664. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|