Skip Navigation


Hum. Reprod. Advance Access originally published online on December 9, 2004
Human Reproduction 2005 20(3):611-615; doi:10.1093/humrep/deh663
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF ) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
20/3/611    most recent
deh663v2
deh663v1
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (21)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Klinkert, E.R.
Right arrow Articles by te Velde, E.R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Klinkert, E.R.
Right arrow Articles by te Velde, E.R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Human Reproduction Vol. 20 No. 3 © The Author 2004; all rights reserved

Expected poor responders on the basis of an antral follicle count do not benefit from a higher starting dose of gonadotrophins in IVF treatment: a randomized controlled trial*

E.R. Klinkert1,3, F.J.M. Broekmans1, C.W.N. Looman2, J.D.F. Habbema2 and E.R. te Velde1

1 Department of Reproductive Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX Utrecht and 2 Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Dr Molewaterplein 50, 3015 GE Rotterdam, The Netherlands

3 To whom the correspondence should be addressed. Email: e.r.klinkert{at}azu.nl

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of doubling the starting dose of gonadotrophins on the ovarian response in IVF patients with a low antral follicle count (AFC). METHODS: Fifty-two patients with an AFC of <5 follicles of 2–5 mm diameter before starting their first IVF cycle participated in this randomized controlled trial. They were randomized by opening a sealed envelope, receiving either 150 IU (group I, n=26) or 300 IU (group II, n=26) of rFSH as a starting dose. The main outcome measures of the study were number of oocytes, poor response (<4 oocytes at retrieval or cancellation due to insufficient follicle growth) and ongoing pregnancy (12 weeks of gestation). RESULTS: The groups were comparable regarding patient characteristics and outcome of the IVF treatment. The median number of oocytes collected was 3 for both groups (P=0.79). The difference in the mean number of oocytes was 0.3 oocytes in favour of group I (P=0.69). Sixty-five per cent of the patients in group I experienced a poor response and 62% in group II. The ongoing pregnancy rate was 8% in group I and 4% in group II (P=0.55). CONCLUSIONS: Expected poor response patients, defined as patients with an AFC <5, are likely not to benefit from a higher starting dose of gonadotrophins in IVF.

Key words: antral follicles/gonadotrophin dose/IVF/poor response/randomized study

* Presented in part as an oral presentation at the 19th annual meeting of the ESHRE in Madrid, July 1, 2003.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
C. Gnoth, A.N. Schuring, K. Friol, J. Tigges, P. Mallmann, and E. Godehardt
Relevance of anti-Mullerian hormone measurement in a routine IVF program
Hum. Reprod., June 1, 2008; 23(6): 1359 - 1365.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum Reprod UpdateHome page
T.E.M. Verhagen, D.J. Hendriks, L.F.J.M.M. Bancsi, B.W.J. Mol, and F.J.M. Broekmans
The accuracy of multivariate models predicting ovarian reserve and pregnancy after in vitro fertilization: a meta-analysis
Hum. Reprod. Update, March 1, 2008; 14(2): 95 - 100.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum Reprod UpdateHome page
F.J. Broekmans, J. Kwee, D.J. Hendriks, B.W. Mol, and C.B. Lambalk
A systematic review of tests predicting ovarian reserve and IVF outcome
Hum. Reprod. Update, November 1, 2006; 12(6): 685 - 718.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
A. Maheshwari, P. Fowler, and S. Bhattacharya
Assessment of ovarian reserve--should we perform tests of ovarian reserve routinely?
Hum. Reprod., November 1, 2006; 21(11): 2729 - 2735.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Endocr. Rev.Home page
N. S. Macklon, R. L. Stouffer, L. C. Giudice, and B. C. J. M. Fauser
The Science behind 25 Years of Ovarian Stimulation for in Vitro Fertilization
Endocr. Rev., April 1, 2006; 27(2): 170 - 207.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
B. Friden, J. Hreinsson, and O. Hovatta
Birth of a healthy infant after in vitro oocyte maturation and ICSI in a woman with diminished ovarian response: Case report
Hum. Reprod., September 1, 2005; 20(9): 2556 - 2558.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
R. A. Lobo
Potential Options for Preservation of Fertility in Women
N. Engl. J. Med., July 7, 2005; 353(1): 64 - 73.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.