Skip Navigation


Hum. Reprod. Advance Access originally published online on January 21, 2005
Human Reproduction 2005 20(4):928-935; doi:10.1093/humrep/deh702
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF ) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
20/4/928    most recent
deh702v1
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (5)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by McChesney, R.
Right arrow Articles by Canfield, R. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by McChesney, R.
Right arrow Articles by Canfield, R. E.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2005. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. All rights reserved.

Intact HCG, free HCG {beta} subunit and HCG {beta} core fragment: longitudinal patterns in urine during early pregnancy

Ruth McChesney1, Allen J. Wilcox2,8, John F. O'Connor3, Clarice R. Weinberg4, Donna D. Baird2, John P. Schlatterer3, D.Robert McConnaughey5, Steven Birken6 and Robert E. Canfield7

1 Brooklyn College, The City University of New York, 3 Irving Center for Clinical Research and 6 Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 7 Department of Medicine, College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, NY, 2 Epidemiology Branch and 4 Biostatistics Branch, NIEHS and 5 WESTAT, Durham, NC, USA

8 To whom correspondence should be addressed at: Epidemiology Branch MD A3-05, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS), Durham, NC 27709, USA. Email: wilcox{at}niehs.nih.gov

BACKGROUND: Detecting and monitoring early pregnancy depend on the measurement of HCG. Little is known about how production of various forms of HCG may evolve over the earliest weeks of pregnancy, particularly in naturally conceived pregnancies. METHODS: We describe the daily excretion of three urinary HCG analytes during the first 6 weeks post-conception in 37 naturally conceived pregnancies ending in singleton birth. We assayed daily first morning urine samples for intact HCG, free {beta} subunit and core fragment, plus the combined measurement of these HCG forms. We calculated doubling times for each analyte and the inter- and intra-subject day-to-day variation. RESULTS: Intact HCG and the free {beta} subunit were initially the predominant forms of HCG, with the {beta} core fragment emerging as the predominant form in the fifth week after conception. Intact HCG and the free {beta} subunit showed the most day-to-day variability, and were transiently undetectable even 10 days after detection of pregnancy. The most stable estimate of doubling time was provided by the combined measurement of all these forms. CONCLUSIONS: Although intact HCG is usually regarded as the main analyte for detection and monitoring of early pregnancy, it can fluctuate markedly during early pregnancy. This variability could affect pregnancy test results based on early pregnancy urine, and may distort estimates of doubling time. Assays that combine several forms of HCG may be more reliable.

Key words: HCG/longitudinal patterns/pregnancy/urine


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Clin. Chem.Home page
A. M. Gronowski, M. Cervinski, U.-H. Stenman, A. Woodworth, L. Ashby, and M. G. Scott
False-Negative Results in Point-of-Care Qualitative Human Chorionic Gonadotropin (hCG) Devices Due to Excess hCG{beta} Core Fragment
Clin. Chem., July 1, 2009; 55(7): 1389 - 1394.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum Reprod UpdateHome page
S.F. de Medeiros and R.J. Norman
Human choriogonadotrophin protein core and sugar branches heterogeneity: basic and clinical insights
Hum. Reprod. Update, January 1, 2009; 15(1): 69 - 95.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
P.A. Nepomnaschy, C.R. Weinberg, A.J. Wilcox, and D.D. Baird
Urinary hCG patterns during the week following implantation
Hum. Reprod., February 1, 2008; 23(2): 271 - 277.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Chem.Home page
C. S. Sigel and D. G. Grenache
Detection of Unexpected Isoforms of Human Chorionic Gonadotropin by Qualitative Tests
Clin. Chem., May 1, 2007; 53(5): 989 - 990.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
J.H.E. Promislow, D.D. Baird, A.J. Wilcox, and C.R. Weinberg
Bleeding following pregnancy loss before 6 weeks' gestation
Hum. Reprod., March 1, 2007; 22(3): 853 - 857.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum Reprod UpdateHome page
U.-H. Stenman, A. Tiitinen, H. Alfthan, and L. Valmu
The classification, functions and clinical use of different isoforms of HCG
Hum. Reprod. Update, November 1, 2006; 12(6): 769 - 784.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
P. Lohstroh, H. Dong, J. Chen, N. Gee, X. Xu, and B. Lasley
Daily Immunoactive and Bioactive Human Chorionic Gonadotropin Profiles in Periimplantation Urine Samples
Biol Reprod, July 1, 2006; 75(1): 24 - 33.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.