Skip Navigation


Hum. Reprod. Advance Access originally published online on June 9, 2005
Human Reproduction 2005 20(9):2426-2433; doi:10.1093/humrep/dei106
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF ) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
20/9/2426    most recent
dei106v1
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (3)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lainas, T.
Right arrow Articles by Alexopoulou, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lainas, T.
Right arrow Articles by Alexopoulou, E.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2005. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions{at}oupjournals.org

In a flexible antagonist protocol, earlier, criteria-based initiation of GnRH antagonist is associated with increased pregnancy rates in IVF

Trifon Lainas1,5, John Zorzovilis1, George Petsas1, Georgia Stavropoulou1, Haris Cazlaris2, Vassiliki Daskalaki3, George Lainas4 and Efthymia Alexopoulou4

1 Iatriki Erevna-IVF Unit, 7, Ventiri Str., Athens 11528, 2 University of Thessaly, Medical School, Histology-Embryology Department, Larissa, 3 General Hospital ‘G.GENNIMATAS’, 154, Mesogion Avenue, Athens and 4 Second Radiology Department, University of Athens, Athens, Greece

5 To whom correspondence should be addressed. Email: iatrikiereyna{at}ath.forthnet.gr

BACKGROUND: The purpose of the study was to assess ongoing pregnancy rates across groups of patients treated by IVF, which were defined according to criteria aimed at the prevention of premature LH surge and used for initiating GnRH antagonist. METHODS: This is a prospective observational cohort study. During the last 3 years, in IVF-ICSI patients undergoing controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) with the antagonist protocol, the antagonist administration was initiated according to at least one of the following patient-specific criteria: (i) at least one follicle measuring >14 mm; (ii) estradiol levels >600 pg/ml; and (iii) LH levels >10 IU/l. Based upon these criteria, 208 cases of normal responders were analysed and categorized into three groups according to the starting day of the regimen: group D4 (n=40) for day 4, group D5 (n=98) for day 5 and group D6 (n=70) for day 6. The main outcome measure was the ongoing pregnancy rate per started cycle. RESULTS: The total number of patients in the D4 and D5 groups (138 out of 208), who received the antagonist earlier, was considerably larger compared with that of D6 (70 out of 208). Ongoing pregnancy rates were 37.5, 34.7 and 18.6% for groups D4, D5 and D6, respectively. Patients who initiated the GnRH antagonist on days 4 and 5 had statistically significant higher pregnancy rates compared with day 6. Rapid response, causing earlier antagonist administration initiation, according to the proposed criteria for the prevention of premature LH surges, and the absence of premature luteinization, as evidenced by normal progesterone levels on HCG day, were found to be independent positive predictive factors for favourable IVF outcome. CONCLUSIONS: The employment of an algorithm of criteria, aimed at the prevention of premature LH surges in a flexible antagonist protocol, resulted in antagonist initiation earlier than on stimulation day 6 in a significant proportion of patients. In those patients, a higher pregnancy rate was observed.

Key words: criteria for antagonist initiation/flexible antagonist protocol/GnRH antagonist


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
T. G. Lainas, I. A. Sfontouris, E. G. Papanikolaou, J. Z. Zorzovilis, G. K. Petsas, G. T. Lainas, and E. M. Kolibianakis
Flexible GnRH antagonist versus flare-up GnRH agonist protocol in poor responders treated by IVF: a randomized controlled trial
Hum. Reprod., June 1, 2008; 23(6): 1355 - 1358.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
J.A. Huirne, R. Homburg, and C.B. Lambalk
Are GnRH antagonists comparable to agonists for use in IVF?
Hum. Reprod., November 1, 2007; 22(11): 2805 - 2813.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
T. G. Lainas, G. K. Petsas, I. Z. Zorzovilis, G. S. Iliadis, G. T. Lainas, H. E. Cazlaris, and E. M. Kolibianakis
Initiation of GnRH antagonist on Day 1 of stimulation as compared to the long agonist protocol in PCOS patients. A randomized controlled trial: effect on hormonal levels and follicular development
Hum. Reprod., June 1, 2007; 22(6): 1540 - 1546.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.