Skip Navigation


Hum. Reprod. Advance Access originally published online on May 5, 2005
Human Reproduction 2005 20(9):2476-2482; doi:10.1093/humrep/dei067
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF ) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
20/9/2476    most recent
dei067v1
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (9)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pinton, A.
Right arrow Articles by Ducos, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Pinton, A.
Right arrow Articles by Ducos, A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2005. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions{at}oupjournals.org

Comparison of male and female meiotic segregation patterns in translocation heterozygotes: a case study in an animal model (Sus scrofa domestica L.)

A. Pinton1,5, T. Faraut2, M. Yerle2, J. Gruand3, F. Pellestor4 and A. Ducos1

1 UMR INRA-ENVT Cytogénétique des Populations Animales, 31076 Toulouse, 2 Laboratoire de Génétique Cellulaire, INRA, 31326 Castanet Tolosan, 3 Unité de sélection porcine SESP, INRA, 86480 Rouillé and 4 CNRS, UPR 1142, 34396 Montpellier, France

5 To whom correspondence should be addressed at: UMR INRA-ENVT Cytogénétique des Populations Animales, Ecole Nationale Vétérinaire de Toulouse, BP 87614, 23 chemin des Capelles, 31076 Toulouse Cedex 3, France. Email: a.pinton{at}envt.fr

BACKGROUND: The comparison of male and female meiotic segregation patterns for individuals carrying identical reciprocal translocations has been rarely reported in mammalian species. The main comparative study involving males and females with comparable genetic background has been performed in the mouse. Swine is another relevant animal model species for meiotic studies. Here we present the segregation patterns determined for sows carrying one of the two following reciprocal translocations: 38, XX, rcp(3;15)(q27;q13), and 38, XX, rcp(12;14)(q13;q21). These segregation data were compared to those previously obtained for closely related boars carrying the same balanced chromosomal rearrangements. METHODS: Dual colour in situ hybridization of whole chromosome painting probes was carried out on metaphases of in vitro-matured oocytes II. Segregation results were obtained for 118 and 206 metaphases II respectively for the two translocations. RESULTS: Significant differences between sexes were demonstrated for both rearrangements. For instance, for the 3/15 translocation, the chromosomally unbalanced gametes were of different origin: preponderance of the adjacent-I segregation in the male (31.4%), and of the adjacent-II (14.3%) and 3:1 (14.3%) segregations in females. For the 12/14 translocation, the proportion of balanced gametes was greater in males than in females (75.9 and 59.4% respectively). CONCLUSION: This study is a new scientific contribution to compare the segregation patterns of male and female carriers of identical chromosomal rearrangements. The results obtained are consistent with those previously reported in mice. Hypotheses to interpret the observed differences between the two translocations, as well as between the male and female segregation patterns, are formulated and discussed.

Key words: chromosome/meiosis/pig/reciprocal translocation/segregation


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
A. Pinton, A. Calgaro, N. Bonnet, S. Ferchaud, S. Billoux, A.M. Dudez, N. Mary, K. Massip, A. Bonnet-Garnier, M. Yerle, et al.
Influence of sex on the meiotic segregation of a t(13;17) Robertsonian translocation: a case study in the pig
Hum. Reprod., August 1, 2009; 24(8): 2034 - 2043.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J AndrolHome page
S. Canovas, P. Coy, and E. Gomez
First Steps in the Development of a Functional Assay for Human Sperm Using Pig Oocytes
J Androl, March 1, 2007; 28(2): 273 - 281.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
K. Moradkhani, J. Puechberty, S. Bhatt, J. Lespinasse, P. Vago, G. Lefort, P. Sarda, S. Hamamah, and F. Pellestor
Rare Robertsonian translocations and meiotic behaviour: sperm FISH analysis of t(13;15) and t(14;15) translocations: A Case Report
Hum. Reprod., December 1, 2006; 21(12): 3193 - 3198.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.