Skip Navigation


Hum. Reprod. Advance Access originally published online on November 10, 2005
Human Reproduction 2006 21(1):150-158; doi:10.1093/humrep/dei354
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF ) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
21/1/150    most recent
dei354v1
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (10)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Paul, S.
Right arrow Articles by Stewart, J.A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Paul, S.
Right arrow Articles by Stewart, J.A.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2005. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Recruitment of sperm donors: the Newcastle-upon-Tyne experience 1994–2003

S. Paul1,2, S. Harbottle1 and J.A. Stewart1,3

1 Newcastle Fertility Centre at Life, Bioscience Centre, International Centre for Life, Times Square, Newcastle-upon-Tyne NE1 4EP, UK 2 Present address: Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Royal Victoria Infirmary, Queen Victoria Road, Newcastle-upon-Tyne NE1 4LP, UK

3 To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: jane.stewart{at}nuth.northy.nhs.uk

BACKGROUND: The demand for sperm donors has continued despite the introduction of ICSI. This study was undertaken in the light of impending changes in donor anonymity laws to evaluate the recruitment process of sperm donors. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of 1101 potential sperm donors in a tertiary referral centre between January 1994 and August 2003. The main outcome measures were to determine the demographic details, recruitment rate and reasons for rejection of donors. RESULTS: The majority of the applicants were aged <36 years (88.07%), students (54.88%), without a partner (53.47%), unmarried (85.38%) and without proven fecundity (78.67%). Only 3.63% of the applicants were released as donors, 30.79% defaulted, whilst 64.48% were rejected. The most common reason for rejection was suboptimal semen quality (85.07%). Over the years, the numbers of the applicants and released donors have declined significantly. The overall clinical pregnancy rate from donor sperm during this period was 23.52%. CONCLUSIONS: In this successful anonymous sperm donor programme only a small proportion of the applicants are released as donors. The significant decline in released sperm donors coupled with the potential effects of loss of donor anonymity means that new strategies for sperm donor recruitment are urgently required.

Key words: anonymity/donor/recruitment/sperm


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Hum ReprodHome page
S. Yee
'Gift without a price tag': altruism in anonymous semen donation
Hum. Reprod., January 1, 2009; 24(1): 3 - 13.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 BMJHome page
M. Hamilton and A. Pacey
Sperm donation in the UK
BMJ, November 11, 2008; 337(nov11_3): a2318 - a2318.
[Full Text]

Home page
 Hum ReprodHome page
C. Wang, M.-Y. Tsai, M.-H. Lee, S.-Y. Huang, C.-H. Kao, H.-N. Ho, and C. K. Hsiao
Maximum number of live births per donor in artificial insemination
Hum. Reprod., May 1, 2007; 22(5): 1363 - 1372.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Hum ReprodHome page
K. M. Godman, K. Sanders, M. Rosenberg, and P. Burton
Potential sperm donors', recipients' and their partners' opinions towards the release of identifying information in Western Australia
Hum. Reprod., November 1, 2006; 21(11): 3022 - 3026.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Hum ReprodHome page
A. P. Ferraretti, G. Pennings, L. Gianaroli, and M. C. Magli
Semen donor recruitment in an oocyte donation programme
Hum. Reprod., October 1, 2006; 21(10): 2482 - 2485.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.