Skip Navigation


Hum. Reprod. Advance Access originally published online on August 26, 2006
Human Reproduction 2006 21(11):2729-2735; doi:10.1093/humrep/del188
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF ) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
21/11/2729    most recent
del188v1
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (6)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Maheshwari, A.
Right arrow Articles by Bhattacharya, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Maheshwari, A.
Right arrow Articles by Bhattacharya, S.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2006. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Assessment of ovarian reserve—should we perform tests of ovarian reserve routinely?

Abha Maheshwari1, Paul Fowler and Siladitya Bhattacharya

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Aberdeen University, Assisted Conception Unit, Aberdeen Maternity Hospital, Aberdeen, UK

1 To whom correspondence should be addressed at: Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Aberdeen University, Assisted Conception Unit, Aberdeen Maternity Hospital, Aberdeen AB25 2ZL, UK. E-mail: abha.maheshwari{at}abdn.ac.uk

Women undergoing IVF are routinely subjected to one or more tests of ovarian reserve. The results of these tests are also being extrapolated to women attending infertility clinics and those planning to delay childbearing. This debate examines the predictive power of currently available tests of ovarian reserve and questions the value of subjecting women to ovarian reserve tests. We propose that in the absence of an agreement on (i) a definition of poor ovarian reserve, (ii) the population to be tested and (iii) which interventions are effective in women with poor ovarian reserve, routine ovarian reserve testing is unhelpful.

Key words: assisted reproduction/FSH/infertility/oocyte quality/ovarian reserve


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Hum ReprodHome page
M.L. Haadsma, H. Groen, V. Fidler, A. Bukman, E.M.A. Roeloffzen, E.R. Groenewoud, F.J.M. Broekmans, M.J. Heineman, and A. Hoek
The predictive value of ovarian reserve tests for spontaneous pregnancy in subfertile ovulatory women
Hum. Reprod., August 1, 2008; 23(8): 1800 - 1807.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Hum ReprodHome page
A. Maheshwari, M. Hamilton, and S. Bhattacharya
Effect of female age on the diagnostic categories of infertility
Hum. Reprod., March 1, 2008; 23(3): 538 - 542.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Hum ReprodHome page
J. P. Balmaceda and J.-E. Schwarze
Assessment of ovarian reserve--should we perform tests of ovarian reserve routinely?
Hum. Reprod., May 1, 2007; 22(5): 1492 - 1492.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.