Hum. Reprod. Advance Access originally published online on June 22, 2006
Human Reproduction 2006 21(11):2736-2738; doi:10.1093/humrep/del249
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
OPINION |
Is twin pregnancy necessarily an adverse outcome of assisted reproductive technologies?
1 Center for Reproductive Medicine, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam and 2 Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Máxima Medical Center, Veldhoven, The Netherlands
3 To whom correspondence should be addressed at: Center for Reproductive Medicine, Academic Medical Center, Meibergdreef 9, H4-213, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands. E-mail: m.vanwely{at}amc.uva.nl
It has recently been suggested that the measure of success of assisted reproductive technologies (ART) should be the birth of a singleton baby, whereas a twin pregnancy should be considered as a complication. Although the maternal and neonatal complications in twin pregnancies are significantly higher than those in singleton pregnancies, the classification of a twin pregnancy as a complication of ART is in our opinion debatable. Most twin pregnancies result in the birth of two healthy babies, with little or no complication for the mother, and only few twin pregnancies results in serious morbidity of the mother and of one or both of the children. The crux of our arguments is that one should consider those cases as poor outcomes and not a twin pregnancy per se.
Key words: artificial reproductive technologies (ART)/complications/twin pregnancy
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A.M. van Peperstraten, R.P.M.G. Hermens, W.L.D.M. Nelen, P.F.M. Stalmeier, G.J. Scheffer, R.P.T.M. Grol, and J.A.M. Kremer Perceived barriers to elective single embryo transfer among IVF professionals: a national survey Hum. Reprod., September 4, 2008; (2008) den327v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A.M. van Peperstraten, W.L.D.M. Nelen, R.P.M.G Hermens, L. Jansen, E. Scheenjes, D.D.M. Braat, R.P.T.M. Grol, and J.A.M. Kremer Why don't we perform elective single embryo transfer? A qualitative study among IVF patients and professionals Hum. Reprod., September 1, 2008; 23(9): 2036 - 2042. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M.M.E. van Rumste, I.M. Custers, F. van der Veen, M. van Wely, J.L.H. Evers, and B.W.J. Mol The influence of the number of follicles on pregnancy rates in intrauterine insemination with ovarian stimulation: a meta-analysis Hum. Reprod. Update, August 6, 2008; (2008) dmn034v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Belaisch-Allart Is twin pregnancy necessarily an adverse outcome of assisted reproductive technologies? Hum. Reprod., May 1, 2007; 22(5): 1495 - 1495. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. H. James Monitoring reproductive health in Europe: what are the best indicators? Hum. Reprod., May 1, 2007; 22(5): 1197 - 1199. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. J. Stillman A 47-Year-Old Woman With Fertility Problems Who Desires a Multiple Pregnancy JAMA, February 28, 2007; 297(8): 858 - 867. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||


