Skip Navigation


Hum. Reprod. Advance Access originally published online on July 13, 2006
Human Reproduction 2006 21(11):2916-2921; doi:10.1093/humrep/del271
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF ) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
21/11/2916    most recent
del271v1
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cerne, A.
Right arrow Articles by Westlander, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Cerne, A.
Right arrow Articles by Westlander, G.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2006. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Pre-ovarian block versus paracervical block for oocyte retrieval

Anna Cerne1,5, Christina Bergh1, Kia Borg2, Ingvar Ek3, Ann-Louise Gejervall1, Torbjörn Hillensjö2, Jan I. Olofsson2, Elisabet Stener-Victorin4, Margareta Wood2 and Göran Westlander1

1 Centre of Reproductive Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Institution of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy 2 Fertility Centre Scandinavia, Carlanderska Hospital, Goteborg 3 Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Karolinska University Hospital/Huddinge, Stockholm and 4 Institution of Neuroscience and Physiology, Sahlgrenska Academy, Goteborg University, Goteborg, Sweden

5 To whom correspondence should be addressed at: Centre of Reproductive Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Institution of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, SE-413 45 Goteborg, Sweden. E-mail: anna.m.cerne{at}vgregion.se

BACKGROUND: A pre-ovarian block (POB) technique can be used for pain relief during oocyte retrieval in IVF. The local anaesthetic is deposited in the vaginal wall and between the vaginal wall and the peritoneal surface near the ovary using ultrasound guidance. The aim of this study was to test whether analgesia with POB resulted in improved pain relief compared to paracervical block (PCB). METHODS: A prospective, randomized, multicentre study of POB versus PCB (10 ml of 1% lidocaine each) with 183 patients randomized to POB (n = 96) or PCB (n = 87) was performed. Randomization (via a computer-generated list) was balanced for age, previously completed IVF cycles, degree of anxiety, estimated number of follicles, BMI, premedication and centre. Pain was measured using a visual analogue scale (VAS, 0–100 mm) and given as median values. The primary end-point of this study was overall VAS pain score for both sides during the oocyte retrieval procedure. RESULTS: Overall pain during the entire oocyte retrieval was 22 (POB) and 16 (PCB) (P = 0.42). No differences were found in degree of anxiety, premedication, dose of alfentanil, fertilization rate, number of good-quality embryos or clinical pregnancy rate. CONCLUSIONS: No differences were found in overall pain experienced during the entire oocyte retrieval procedure with POB compared to PCB.

Key words: oocyte retrieval/pain relief/paracervical block/pre-ovarian block


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.