Skip Navigation


Hum. Reprod. Advance Access originally published online on November 3, 2005
Human Reproduction 2006 21(2):358-363; doi:10.1093/humrep/dei355
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF ) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
21/2/358    most recent
dei355v1
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (5)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rajkhowa, M.
Right arrow Articles by Thomas, G.E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rajkhowa, M.
Right arrow Articles by Thomas, G.E.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2005. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Reasons for discontinuation of IVF treatment: a questionnaire study

M. Rajkhowa1,3, A. Mcconnell1 and G.E. Thomas2

1 Assisted Conception Unit, Ninewells Hospital & Medical School, Dundee DD1 9SY and 2 Department of Mathematics, Dundee University, Dundee, UK

3 To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: madhurima.rajkhowa{at}tuht.scot.nhs.uk

BACKGROUND: IVF and embryo transfer has become an established and increasingly successful form of treatment for infertility, yet significant numbers of couples discontinue treatment without achieving a live birth. This study aims to identify major factors that influence the decision to discontinue IVF treatment. METHODS: Questionnaires were sent to 1510 couples who had undergone IVF treatment at Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, Dundee, Scotland, between January 1995 and December 2001. The main outcome measure was the number of couples who discontinue treatment and the reasons for discontinuation including live birth, lack of success, lack of funding, psychological stress, medical advice, physical discomfort, personal and other reasons. RESULTS: The response rate was 55% (732/1327) with 183 questionnaires returned as address unknown. A total of 515 couples had discontinued treatment at time of response, with 266 (52%) having achieved a live birth. Achieving a live birth was the reason for discontinuation where a single reason was given. Those who did not conceive gave a combination of reasons. Lack of personal and/or National Health Service funding was cited by 23% of couples as a reason. Lack of success and psychological stress were reported as factors by 23 and 36% of couples respectively. These two factors are very strongly associated (P < 0.001), both being reported by 18% of couples with a reciprocal increase in those quoting lack of success and psychological stress as reasons for discontinuation with increasing number of attempts (P < 0.0005). Changes in personal circumstances were reported by 30% and <10% gave general discomfort or advice from medical staff as reasons. CONCLUSIONS: Though funding is an important issue, factors including lack of success and psychological stress play a greater role in influencing the decision to discontinue treatment. Better information and support are needed to improve the continuation rates.

Key words: discontinuation/funding/IVF/psychological stress


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
P. Devroey, R. Boostanfar, N.P. Koper, B.M.J.L. Mannaerts, P.C. IJzerman-Boon, B.C.J.M. Fauser, and on behalf of the ENGAGE Investigators
A double-blind, non-inferiority RCT comparing corifollitropin alfa and recombinant FSH during the first seven days of ovarian stimulation using a GnRH antagonist protocol
Hum. Reprod., December 1, 2009; 24(12): 3063 - 3072.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
M. Brandes, J.O.M. van der Steen, S.B. Bokdam, C.J.C.M. Hamilton, J.P. de Bruin, W.L.D.M. Nelen, and J.A.M. Kremer
When and why do subfertile couples discontinue their fertility care? A longitudinal cohort study in a secondary care subfertility population
Hum. Reprod., December 1, 2009; 24(12): 3127 - 3135.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
S. Dyer, C. Lombard, and Z. Van der Spuy
Psychological distress among men suffering from couple infertility in South Africa: a quantitative assessment
Hum. Reprod., November 1, 2009; 24(11): 2821 - 2826.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
P. Devroey, M. Aboulghar, J. Garcia-Velasco, G. Griesinger, P. Humaidan, E. Kolibianakis, W. Ledger, C. Tomas, and B. C.J.M. Fauser
Improving the patient's experience of IVF/ICSI: a proposal for an ovarian stimulation protocol with GnRH antagonist co-treatment
Hum. Reprod., April 1, 2009; 24(4): 764 - 774.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
M.F.G. Verberg, M.J.C. Eijkemans, E.M.E.W. Heijnen, F.J. Broekmans, C. de Klerk, B.C.J.M. Fauser, and N.S. Macklon
Why do couples drop-out from IVF treatment? A prospective cohort study
Hum. Reprod., September 1, 2008; 23(9): 2050 - 2055.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
N. Soullier, J. Bouyer, J.L. Pouly, J. Guibert, and E. de La Rochebrochard
Estimating the success of an in vitro fertilization programme using multiple imputation
Hum. Reprod., January 1, 2008; 23(1): 187 - 192.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
D. M. Campagne
Should fertilization treatment start with reducing stress?
Hum. Reprod., July 1, 2006; 21(7): 1651 - 1658.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.