Skip Navigation


Hum. Reprod. Advance Access originally published online on November 25, 2005
Human Reproduction 2006 21(3):721-727; doi:10.1093/humrep/dei395
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF ) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
21/3/721    most recent
dei395v1
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (6)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by de Klerk, C.
Right arrow Articles by Hunfeld, J.A.M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by de Klerk, C.
Right arrow Articles by Hunfeld, J.A.M.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2005. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

The psychological impact of mild ovarian stimulation combined with single embryo transfer compared with conventional IVF

C. de Klerk1,4, E.M.E.W. Heijnen2,3, N.S. Macklon2,3, H.J. Duivenvoorden1, B.C.J.M. Fauser2,3, J. Passchier1 and J.A.M. Hunfeld1

1 Department of Medical Psychology and Psychotherapy, 2 Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Erasmus MC, 3015 GD Rotterdam and 3 Department of Reproductive Medicine, University Medical Center, 3584 CX Utrecht, The Netherlands

4 To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: c.deklerk{at}erasmusmc.nl

BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to assess the psychological implications of mild ovarian stimulation combined with single embryo transfer (SET) during a first IVF cycle. METHODS: We conducted a randomized controlled two-centre trial. Three hundred and ninety-one couples were randomized to undergo either mild ovarian stimulation with GnRH antagonist co-treatment and SET (n = 199) or conventional GnRH agonist long protocol ovarian stimulation with double embryo transfer (DET) (n = 192). Women completed the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, the Hopkins Symptom Checklist and the Subjective Sleep Quality Scale at baseline, on the first day of ovarian stimulation and following embryo transfer. Affect was assessed daily with the Daily Record Keeping Chart from the first day of ovarian stimulation until the day treatment outcome became known. RESULTS: The conventional IVF group experienced elevated levels of physical and depressive symptoms during pituitary downregulation. At oocyte retrieval, this group experienced more positive affect and less negative affect than the mild IVF group. In the conventional IVF group, cycle cancellation was associated with less positive and more negative affect. CONCLUSIONS: During the first IVF treatment cycle, mild ovarian stimulation and SET does not lead to more psychological complaints than conventional IVF.

Key words: affect/GnRH antagonist/IVF/psychology/single embryo transfer


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Hum ReprodHome page
M.F.G. Verberg, M.J.C. Eijkemans, E.M.E.W. Heijnen, F.J. Broekmans, C. de Klerk, B.C.J.M. Fauser, and N.S. Macklon
Why do couples drop-out from IVF treatment? A prospective cohort study
Hum. Reprod., September 1, 2008; 23(9): 2050 - 2055.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 The Obstetrician and GynaecologistHome page
I. Kosmas, J. Van der Elst, P. Devroey, and H. Tournaye
Elective single embryo transfer
Obstet Gynaecol (Lond), July 1, 2008; 10(3): 163 - 169.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Hum ReprodHome page
C. de Klerk, J.A.M. Hunfeld, E.M.E.W. Heijnen, M.J.C. Eijkemans, B.C.J.M. Fauser, J. Passchier, and N.S. Macklon
Low negative affect prior to treatment is associated with a decreased chance of live birth from a first IVF cycle
Hum. Reprod., January 1, 2008; 23(1): 112 - 116.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Hum ReprodHome page
C. de Klerk, N.S. Macklon, E.M.E.W. Heijnen, M.J.C. Eijkemans, B.C.J.M. Fauser, J. Passchier, and J.A.M. Hunfeld
The psychological impact of IVF failure after two or more cycles of IVF with a mild versus standard treatment strategy
Hum. Reprod., September 1, 2007; 22(9): 2554 - 2558.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Hum ReprodHome page
G. Pennings and W. Ombelet
Coming soon to your clinic: patient-friendly ART
Hum. Reprod., August 1, 2007; 22(8): 2075 - 2079.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.