Skip Navigation


Hum. Reprod. Advance Access originally published online on March 3, 2006
Human Reproduction 2006 21(7):1901-1906; doi:10.1093/humrep/del047
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF ) Freely available
Right arrowOA All Versions of this Article:
21/7/1901    most recent
del047v1
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jarrell, J. F.
Right arrow Articles by Avila, M. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Jarrell, J. F.
Right arrow Articles by Avila, M. H.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?


© The Author 2006. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org The online version of this article has been published under an open access model. Users are entitled to use, reproduce, disseminate, or display the open access version of this article for non-commercial purposes provided that: the original authorship is properly and fully attributed; the Journal and Oxford University Press are attributed as the original place of publication with the correct citation details given; if an article is subsequently reproduced or disseminated not in its entirety but only in part or as a derivative work this must be clearly indicated. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Maternal lead exposure and the secondary sex ratio

John F. Jarrell 1 , 2 , 5 , Marc G. Weisskopf 1 , Jennifer Weuve 1 , Maria Martha Téllez- Rojo 3 , Howard Hu 4 and Mauricio Hernández- Avila 3

1 Harvard School of Public Health, Harvard University, Boston, MA, USA 2 Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada 3 Instituto Nacional de Salud Publica, Mexico City, Mexico and 4 Channing Laboratory, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Harvard University, Boston, MA, USA

5 To whom correspondence should be addressed at: Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Calgary, 1403, 29th Street NW, Calgary, Alberta, Canada T2N 2T9. E-mail: john.jarrell{at}calgaryhealthregion.ca

BACKGROUND: A reduction in the secondary sex ratio may be associated with exposure to environmental toxicants. Little data exists relating this outcome to lead exposure, a well-known reproductive toxicant. METHODS: We studied 1980 women having singleton births from 1994 to 1995 and from 1997 to 2001 who participated in a cohort study of lead exposure and infant outcomes in Mexico City. Levels of lead were measured in maternal and cord blood using graphite furnace atomic absorption spectroscopy, and levels of lead in maternal patella and tibia bone (a reflection of cumulative exposure) were measured using noninvasive K-X-ray fluorescence measurements. Using logistic regression models, we evaluated the relations of these measures to secondary sex ratio in the offspring, adjusting for maternal age, parity and year of infants’ birth. RESULTS: We found no consistent association between any of the lead measures and secondary sex ratio. Results were unchanged when we adjusted for infants’ year of birth, maternal age and parity. CONCLUSIONS: Despite a large sample size and the use of sensitive biomarkers, we did not find evidence that maternal and fetal lead exposure is associated with a lower secondary sex ratio among newborns.

Key words: bone lead/lead/lead measurements/pregnancy/secondary sex ratio


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Hum ReprodHome page
M. G. Weisskopf, J. Weuve, J. Jarrell, H. Hu, M. M. Tellez-Rojo, and M. Hernandez-Avila
Reply: Maternal lead exposure, secondary sex ratio and dose-exposure fallacy
Hum. Reprod., October 1, 2007; 22(10): 2792 - 2793.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Am J EpidemiolHome page
L. A. Wise, L. Titus-Ernstoff, J. R. Palmer, R. N. Hoover, E. E. Hatch, K. M. Perez, W. C. Strohsnitter, R. Kaufman, D. Anderson, and R. Troisi
Time to Pregnancy and Secondary Sex Ratio in Men Exposed Prenatally to Diethylstilbestrol
Am. J. Epidemiol., October 1, 2007; 166(7): 765 - 774.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Hum ReprodHome page
P. H. Jongbloet and N. Roeleveld
Maternal lead exposure, secondary sex ratio and dose-exposure fallacy
Hum. Reprod., October 1, 2007; 22(10): 2792 - 2792.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.