Hum. Reprod. Advance Access originally published online on May 18, 2006
Human Reproduction 2006 21(9):2209-2215; doi:10.1093/humrep/del161
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mini ReviewDevelopments in Reproductive Medicine
The role of three-dimensional ultrasonography in polycystic ovary syndrome
1 O&G, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China and 2 School of Human Development, Academic Division of Reproductive Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
3 To whom correspondence should be addressed at: O&G, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China. E-mail: lampomui{at}cuhk.edu.hk
The 2003 Rotterdam diagnostic criteria for polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) support the objective role of ultrasound in defining the appearance of the PCO, but there are significant limitations of these new guidelines from an ultrasound perspective that must be considered. Three-dimensional (3D) ultrasound provides a new method for the objective quantitative assessment of follicle count, ovarian volume, stromal volume and blood flow within the ovary as a whole. Since the introduction of 3D ultrasonography, there have been increasing publications on PCOS, each addressing different areas and reporting different results. This review critically examines these studies in an attempt to clarify the evidence to date and thereby establish the current role of 3D ultrasonography in PCOS.
Key words: polycystic ovary syndrome/review/three-dimensional/Rotterdam/ultrasound
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
K. Jayaprakasan, J.F. Hopkisson, B.K. Campbell, J. Clewes, I.R. Johnson, and N.J. Raine-Fenning Quantification of the effect of pituitary down-regulation on 3D ultrasound predictors of ovarian response Hum. Reprod., July 1, 2008; 23(7): 1538 - 1544. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. M. Lam, I. R. Johnson, and N. J. Raine-Fenning Three-dimensional ultrasound features of the polycystic ovary and the effect of different phenotypic expressions on these parameters Hum. Reprod., December 1, 2007; 22(12): 3116 - 3123. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
