Skip Navigation


Hum. Reprod. Advance Access originally published online on June 3, 2006
Human Reproduction 2006 21(9):2296-2303; doi:10.1093/humrep/del168
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF ) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
21/9/2296    most recent
del168v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (2)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schunmann, C.
Right arrow Articles by Glasier, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Schunmann, C.
Right arrow Articles by Glasier, A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2006. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Specialist contraceptive counselling and provision after termination of pregnancy improves uptake of long-acting methods but does not prevent repeat abortion: a randomized trial

C. Schunmann1 and Anna Glasier1,2,3,4

1 Lothian NHS Family Planning and Well Woman Services 2 Department of Clinical Science and Community Health University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland and 3 Department of Public Health and Policy, University of London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK

4 To whom correspondence should be addressed at: NHS Lothian Family Planning and Well Woman Services, 18 Dean Terrace, Edinburgh EH4 1NL, Scotland. E-mail: anna.glasier{at}lpct.scot.nhs.uk

BACKGROUND: One in four abortions in the UK is undertaken for women who have had one before. Women undergoing abortion in Edinburgh were targeted for improved contraceptive advice and provision in this randomized trial. METHODS: Between November 2001 and May 2002, women recruited at assessment for abortion were randomized at admission to receive specialist contraceptive advice and enhanced provision (316 women) or standard care (297 women). Randomization was based on the week of admission. Contraceptive use 16 weeks after abortion was assessed by questionnaire and subsequent abortions by review of the hospital records 2 years later. RESULTS: Women receiving specialist advice and enhanced provision were more likely to leave the hospital with contraception (271 versus 115, P < 0.001), which was more likely to be a long-acting method (141 versus 78, P < 0.001) than women receiving standard care. Four months later, there was no significant difference in contraceptive prevalence or continuation, but women in the intervention group were more likely to be using contraceptive implants (32 versus 6, P < 0.001). Two years later, 14.6% of women in the intervention group (44/302) and 10% of controls (27/268) had undergone another abortion in the same hospital (P = 0.267). CONCLUSIONS: Specialist contraceptive advice and enhanced provision had a short-lived effect on contraceptive uptake and increased the use of long-acting methods but did not appear to reduce repeat abortions.

Key words: abortion/contraception/intervention/long-acting/repeat abortion


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
BMJHome page
Minerva
BMJ, September 23, 2006; 333(7569): 662 - 662.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.