Hum. Reprod. Advance Access originally published online on August 18, 2006
Human Reproduction 2007 22(1):174-179; doi:10.1093/humrep/del326
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sperm DNA integrity assessment in prediction of assisted reproduction technology outcome
1 Fertility Clinic, Viborg Hospital (Skive), Skive, Denmark 2 Fertility Centre, Scanian Andrology Centre, Malmö University Hospital, Malmö 3 Division of Occupational and Environmental Medicine and Psychiatric Epidemiology, Lund University, Lund, Sweden and 4 Section of Toxicology and Biomedical Sciences, BIOTEC-MED, ENEA Casaccia Research Center, Rome, Italy
5 To whom correspondence should be addressed at: Fertility Centre, Scanian Andrology Centre, Malmö University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden. E-mail: mona.bungum{at}med.lu.se
BACKGROUND: The sperm chromatin structure assay (SCSA) has been suggested as a predictor of fertility in vivo as well as in vitro. The available data however, have been based on limited numbers of treatments. We aimed to define the clinical role of SCSA in assisted reproduction. METHODS: A total of 998 cycles [387 intrauterine insemination (IUI), 388 IVF and 223 ICSI] from 637 couples were included. SCSA results were expressed as DNA fragmentation index (DFI) and high DNA stainable (HDS) cell fractions. Outcome parameters were biochemical pregnancy (BP), clinical pregnancy (CP) and delivery (D). RESULTS: For IUI, the odds ratios (ORs) for BP, CP and D were significantly lower for couples with DFI >30% as compared with those with DFI
30%. No statistical difference between the outcomes of ICSI versus IVF in the group with DFI
30% was seen. In the DFI >30% group, the results of ICSI were significantly better than those of IVF. CONCLUSIONS: DFI can be used as an independent predictor of fertility in couples undergoing IUI. As a result, we propose that all infertile men should be tested with SCSA as a supplement to the standard semen analysis. When DFI exceeds 30%, ICSI should be the method of choice.
Key words: ICSI/IUI/IVF/SCSA/sperm DNA
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
C. L.R. Barratt, R. J. Aitken, L. Bjorndahl, D. T. Carrell, P. de Boer, U. Kvist, S. E.M. Lewis, S. D. Perreault, M. J. Perry, L. Ramos, et al. Sperm DNA: organization, protection and vulnerability: from basic science to clinical applications--a position report Hum. Reprod., February 6, 2010; (2010) dep465v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. de Jager, N.H. Aneck-Hahn, M.S. Bornman, P. Farias, G. Leter, P. Eleuteri, M. Rescia, and M. Spano Sperm chromatin integrity in DDT-exposed young men living in a malaria area in the Limpopo Province, South Africa Hum. Reprod., October 1, 2009; 24(10): 2429 - 2438. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. Tsarev, M. Bungum, A. Giwercman, J. Erenpreisa, T. Ebessen, E. Ernst, and J. Erenpreiss Evaluation of male fertility potential by Toluidine Blue test for sperm chromatin structure assessment Hum. Reprod., July 1, 2009; 24(7): 1569 - 1574. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Zini and M. Sigman Are Tests of Sperm DNA Damage Clinically Useful? Pros and Cons J Androl, May 1, 2009; 30(3): 219 - 229. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. P. M. Sousa, R. S. Tavares, J. F. Velez de la Calle, H. Figueiredo, V. Almeida, T. Almeida-Santos, and J. Ramalho-Santos Dual use of Diff-Quik-like stains for the simultaneous evaluation of human sperm morphology and chromatin status Hum. Reprod., January 1, 2009; 24(1): 28 - 36. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Zini, J. M. Boman, E. Belzile, and A. Ciampi Sperm DNA damage is associated with an increased risk of pregnancy loss after IVF and ICSI: systematic review and meta-analysis Hum. Reprod., December 1, 2008; 23(12): 2663 - 2668. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. F. Wu and D. S. Chu Sperm Chromatin: Fertile Grounds for Proteomic Discovery of Clinical Tools Mol. Cell. Proteomics, October 1, 2008; 7(10): 1876 - 1886. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J.D.M. Nicopoullos, C. Gilling-Smith, P.A. Almeida, S. Homa, L. Nice, H. Tempest, and J.W.A. Ramsay The role of sperm aneuploidy as a predictor of the success of intracytoplasmic sperm injection? Hum. Reprod., February 1, 2008; 23(2): 240 - 250. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Bungum, M. Spano, P. Humaidan, P. Eleuteri, M. Rescia, and A. Giwercman Sperm chromatin structure assay parameters measured after density gradient centrifugation are not predictive for the outcome of ART Hum. Reprod., January 1, 2008; 23(1): 4 - 10. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. L. Brackett, E. Ibrahim, J. A. Grotas, T. C. Aballa, and C. M. Lynne Higher Sperm DNA Damage in Semen From Men With Spinal Cord Injuries Compared With Controls J Androl, January 1, 2008; 29(1): 93 - 99. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. E M Lewis Is sperm evaluation useful in predicting human fertility? Reproduction, July 1, 2007; 134(1): 31 - 40. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||



