Skip Navigation


Hum. Reprod. Advance Access originally published online on August 17, 2007
Human Reproduction 2007 22(10):2698-2701; doi:10.1093/humrep/dem236
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF ) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
22/10/2698    most recent
dem236v1
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fedele, L.
Right arrow Articles by Frontino, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Fedele, L.
Right arrow Articles by Frontino, G.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2007. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Evaluation of a new questionnaire for the presurgical diagnosis of bladder endometriosis

Luigi Fedele1,3, Stefano Bianchi1, Luca Carmignani2, Nicola Berlanda1, Eleonora Fontana1 and Giada Frontino1

1 Department of Obstetrics, Gynaecology and Neonatology, Fondazione ‘Policlinico-Mangiagalli-Regina Elena’, University of Milano, Via della Commenda 12, 20122 Milano, Italy 2 Department of Nephrourology, Fondazione ‘Policlinico-Mangiagalli-Regina Elena’, University of Milano, Milano, Italy

3 Correspondence address. Tel: +39-02-55032318; Fax: +39-02-50320252; E-mail: luigi.fedele{at}unimi.it

BACKGROUND: The main objective was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of a new questionnaire for the presurgical diagnosis of bladder endometriosis in patients with a high suspicion index for this disease.

METHODS: We included all patients of age <40 years undergoing laparoscopy or laparotomy for chronic pelvic pain. We partially modified the American Urologic Association Symptom Index with the aim of identifying bladder endometriosis among 157 women undergoing surgery for chronic pelvic pain. All patients underwent preoperative ultrasonography; selected patients, with suspected bladder endometriosis, underwent computed tomography and cystoscopy. The physicians performing both the preoperative evaluation and surgery were blinded to the questionnaires’ results.

RESULTS: A total of 127 (81%) patients had pelvic endometriosis, 14 (8.9%) had bladder endometriosis. The questionnaires’ score for patients with and without bladder endometriosis was 21 ± 8.7 and 4.6 ± 5.7, respectively (P < 0.0001). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.951. With a cut-off of 9, sensitivity was 93% and specificity 88%.

CONCLUSIONS: The questionnaire proved to be effective in identifying bladder endometriosis, allowing a proper diagnostic work-up and surgical treatment, and minimizing the risk of recurrence. In this primary referral centre for endometriosis the prevalence of the disease was high—therefore it may achieve a lower diagnostic accuracy when evaluated on a population of women with a lower prevalence of bladder endometriosis.

Key words: bladder endometriosis/questionnaire/chronic pelvic pain/pelvic surgery/presurgical diagnosis

Submitted on May 16, 2007; resubmitted on June 15, 2007; accepted on June 24, 2007.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.