Skip Navigation


Hum. Reprod. Advance Access originally published online on August 29, 2007
Human Reproduction 2007 22(10):2707-2714; doi:10.1093/humrep/dem225
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF )
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
22/10/2707    most recent
dem225v1
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (2)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pinborg, A.
Right arrow Articles by Andersen, A. N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Pinborg, A.
Right arrow Articles by Andersen, A. N.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2007. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Vanishing twins: a predictor of small-for-gestational age in IVF singletons

Anja Pinborg1,3, Øjvind Lidegaard2, Nina la Cour Freiesleben1 and Anders Nyboe Andersen1

1 The Fertility Clinic, The Juliane Marie Center, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshopitalet, Blegdamsvej 9, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark 2 Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Juliane Marie Center, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshopitalet, Blegdamsvej 9, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark

3 Correspondence address. Tel: +45-51-26-06-18; Fax: +45-35-45-49-46; E-mail: pinborg{at}nru.dk

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to assess the effect of a vanishing twin on the risk of being small-for-gestational age (SGA) in in vitro fertilization (IVF) singletons.

METHODS: The study included 642 survivors of a vanished co-twin, 5237 primary singletons and 3678 primary twins. The survivor cohort was subdivided according to gestational age at the time of vanishing to give groups of early (<8 weeks), intermediate (8–22 weeks) and late (>22 weeks) survivors.

RESULTS: The rate of SGA infants was significantly higher in survivors than in singletons (OR: 1.50, 95%CI: 1.03–2.20) and a significant inverse correlation was observed between SGA and the gestational age at the time of vanishing (r = –0.10, P < 0.02). Also in term infants, the risk of birthweight <2500 g was higher in survivors than in singletons (OR: 1.71, 95%CI: 1.06–2.74). A similar increase in the rate of low birthweight in term survivors was seen with increasing gestational age at the time of vanishing (r = –0.12; P < 0.01). In multiple logistic regression analysis adjusting for maternal age, parity, child gender and pre-eclampsia, the vanishing of a co-twin (OR: 1.56, 95%CI: 1.06–2.27) and gestational age at the time of vanishing (OR: 2.08, 95%CI: 1.00–4.35) were the only significant predictors of being SGA.

CONCULSIONS: IVF singletons with a vanished co-twin had a higher rate of SGA than singletons from a single gestation and the risk of SGA is increased with increasing gestational age at the time of vanishing.

Key words: intrauterine growth restriction/IVF/perinatal outcome/small-for-gestational age/vanishing twin

Submitted on December 29, 2006; resubmitted on June 4, 2007; accepted on June 13, 2007.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
G. Griesinger, E.M. Kolibianakis, K. Diedrich, and M. Ludwig
Ovarian stimulation for IVF has no quantitative association with birthweight: a registry study
Hum. Reprod., August 6, 2008; (2008) den286v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
W. Shih, D.D. Rushford, H. Bourne, C. Garrett, J.C. McBain, D.L. Healy, and H.W.G. Baker
Factors affecting low birthweight after assisted reproduction technology: difference between transfer of fresh and cryopreserved embryos suggests an adverse effect of oocyte collection
Hum. Reprod., July 1, 2008; 23(7): 1644 - 1653.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.