Skip Navigation


Hum. Reprod. Advance Access originally published online on September 13, 2007
Human Reproduction 2007 22(11):2824-2828; doi:10.1093/humrep/dem283
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF )
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
22/11/2824    most recent
dem283v1
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kirk, E.
Right arrow Articles by Bourne, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kirk, E.
Right arrow Articles by Bourne, T.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2007. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

The diagnostic effectiveness of an initial transvaginal scan in detecting ectopic pregnancy

Emma Kirk1,5, Aris T. Papageorghiou1,2, George Condous1,3, Linda Tan1, Shabana Bora1 and Tom Bourne1,4

1 Early Pregnancy and Gynaecological Ultrasound Unit, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, St George's, University of London, Cranmer Terrace, London SW17 0RE, UK 2 Fetal Medicine Unit, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, St George's, University of London, London, UK 3 Early Pregnancy and Advanced Endosurgery Unit, Nepean Clinical School, Nepean Hospital, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia 4 Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Hospitals, KU Leuven, Belgium

5 Correspondence address. Tel: +44-208-725-0050; Fax: +44-208-725-0094; E-mail: ejkirk{at}hotmail.co.uk

BACKGROUND: To determine the effectiveness of an initial transvaginal ultrasound scan (TVS) in the detection of ectopic pregnancy in consecutive women attending an early pregnancy unit (EPU).

METHODS: This was a prospective observational study. Unselected women attending a dedicated EPU underwent a TVS. Women were classified as having an intrauterine pregnancy (IUP), ectopic pregnancy or pregnancy of unknown location (PUL). Women with a PUL were followed up until the final location of the pregnancy was determined. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the initial TVS in the diagnosis of ectopic pregnancy were calculated.

RESULTS: During a one-year study period, 5318 consecutive women attended the EPU. Outcome data were available for 5240 (98.5%) women. Of these, the initial TVS showed an IUP in 4693 (89.6%) cases and an ectopic pregnancy in 91 (1.7%) cases. The remaining 456 (8.7%) women were classified as PUL, and of these 31 (6.8%) were subsequently found to have ectopic pregnancies. The overall sensitivity of the initial TVS in the diagnosis of ectopic pregnancy was 73.9% (95% CI: 65.1–81.6) with a specificity of 99.9% (95% CI: 99.8–100), a PPV of 96.7% (95% CI: 90.7–99.3) and an NPV of 99.4% (95% CI: 99.2–99.6).

CONCLUSIONS: In unselected women attending an EPU, pregnancy location can be diagnosed accurately in over 90% of all pregnancies and in 73.9% of ectopic pregnancies with a single TVS.

Key words: transvaginal ultrasound/ectopic pregnancy/intrauterine pregnancy/pregnancy of unknown location

Submitted on April 15, 2007; resubmitted on June 15, 2007; accepted on June 20, 2007.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.