Hum. Reprod. Advance Access originally published online on October 23, 2007
Human Reproduction 2007 22(12):3047-3050; doi:10.1093/humrep/dem253
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
OPINION |
Embryo viability and metabolism: obeying the quiet rules
1 Department of Biology, University of York, PO Box 373, York YO10 5YW, UK 2 Sustainable Livestock Systems Group, SAC, Roslin BioCentre, Roslin, Midlothian EH25 9PS, UK
3 Correspondence address. E-mail: hjl1{at}york.ac.uk
BACKGROUND: It has been proposed that preimplantation embryo viability during culture and following embryo transfer is associated with a quiet metabolism. Viable embryos may be better equipped to contend with damage to the genome, transcriptome and proteome, or they may possess less damage than non-viable embryos.
METHODS: Much of the data for the quiet embryo hypothesis was obtained in the human and mouse. In this article, evidence is reviewed suggesting that the quiet hypothesis may equally be applied to reproduction in livestock, which can provide good models for the human.
RESULTS: Data, particularly for the sheep and cow, suggest that a quiet metabolism during early embryo development is consistent with successful embryo development. Conversely, an active metabolism is associated with sub-optimal outcomes in later life.
CONCLUSIONS: The challenge is to identify the range of values for a given marker within which an embryo has a high chance of giving rise to healthy offspring. We also speculate on the ways in which such a metabolic profile might be encouraged and the implications for weight loss in obese women prior to conception.
Key words: quiet metabolism/embryo viability/embryo transfer/preimplantation development/IVF
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. Ramalho-Santos, S. Varum, S. Amaral, P. C. Mota, A. P. Sousa, and A. Amaral Mitochondrial functionality in reproduction: from gonads and gametes to embryos and embryonic stem cells Hum. Reprod. Update, May 4, 2009; (2009) dmp016v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M A Velazquez, J Zaraza, A Oropeza, R Webb, and H Niemann The role of IGF1 in the in vivo production of bovine embryos from superovulated donors Reproduction, February 1, 2009; 137(2): 161 - 180. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. G. Sturmey, J. A. Hawkhead, E. A. Barker, and H. J. Leese DNA damage and metabolic activity in the preimplantation embryo Hum. Reprod., January 1, 2009; 24(1): 81 - 91. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. J. Leese, C. G. Baumann, D. R. Brison, T. G. McEvoy, and R. G. Sturmey Metabolism of the viable mammalian embryo: quietness revisited Mol. Hum. Reprod., December 1, 2008; 14(12): 667 - 672. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Van Blerkom, P. Davis, and V. Thalhammer Regulation of mitochondrial polarity in mouse and human oocytes: the influence of cumulus derived nitric oxide Mol. Hum. Reprod., August 1, 2008; 14(8): 431 - 444. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||



