Skip Navigation


Hum. Reprod. Advance Access originally published online on October 23, 2007
Human Reproduction 2007 22(12):3047-3050; doi:10.1093/humrep/dem253
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF )
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
22/12/3047    most recent
dem253v1
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Leese, H. J.
Right arrow Articles by McEvoy, T. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Leese, H. J.
Right arrow Articles by McEvoy, T. G.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2007. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

OPINION

Embryo viability and metabolism: obeying the quiet rules

Henry J. Leese1,3, Roger G. Sturmey1, Christoph G. Baumann1 and Tom G. McEvoy2

1 Department of Biology, University of York, PO Box 373, York YO10 5YW, UK 2 Sustainable Livestock Systems Group, SAC, Roslin BioCentre, Roslin, Midlothian EH25 9PS, UK

3 Correspondence address. E-mail: hjl1{at}york.ac.uk

BACKGROUND: It has been proposed that preimplantation embryo viability during culture and following embryo transfer is associated with a ‘quiet’ metabolism. Viable embryos may be better equipped to contend with damage to the genome, transcriptome and proteome, or they may possess less damage than non-viable embryos.

METHODS: Much of the data for the quiet embryo hypothesis was obtained in the human and mouse. In this article, evidence is reviewed suggesting that the quiet hypothesis may equally be applied to reproduction in livestock, which can provide good models for the human.

RESULTS: Data, particularly for the sheep and cow, suggest that a quiet metabolism during early embryo development is consistent with successful embryo development. Conversely, an ‘active’ metabolism is associated with sub-optimal outcomes in later life.

CONCLUSIONS: The challenge is to identify the range of values for a given marker within which an embryo has a high chance of giving rise to healthy offspring. We also speculate on the ways in which such a metabolic profile might be encouraged and the implications for weight loss in obese women prior to conception.

Key words: quiet metabolism/embryo viability/embryo transfer/preimplantation development/IVF


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Mol Hum ReprodHome page
J. Van Blerkom, P. Davis, and V. Thalhammer
Regulation of mitochondrial polarity in mouse and human oocytes: the influence of cumulus derived nitric oxide
Mol. Hum. Reprod., August 1, 2008; 14(8): 431 - 444.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.