Skip Navigation


Hum. Reprod. Advance Access originally published online on January 4, 2007
Human Reproduction 2007 22(4):1021-1025; doi:10.1093/humrep/del470
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF ) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
22/4/1021    most recent
del470v1
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (6)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Donoso, P.
Right arrow Articles by Devroey, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Donoso, P.
Right arrow Articles by Devroey, P.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2007. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Single embryo transfer in preimplantation genetic diagnosis cycles for women <36 years does not reduce delivery rate

P. Donoso1,3, W. Verpoest1, E.G. Papanikolaou1, I. Liebaers2, H.M. Fatemi1, K. Sermon2, C. Staessen2, J. Van der Elst1 and P. Devroey1

1 Centre for Reproductive Medicine, University Hospital, Dutch-Speaking Brussels Free University (Vrije Universiteit Brussel), Brussels, Belgium 2 Centre for Medical Genetics, University Hospital, Dutch-Speaking Brussels Free University (Vrije Universiteit Brussel), Brussels, Belgium

3 To whom correspondence should be addressed at: Centre for Reproductive Medicine, University Hospital, Dutch-Speaking Brussels Free University (Vrije Universiteit Brussel), Laarbeeklaan 101, 1090 Brussels, Belgium. Tel.: +32(0)24774009; E-mail: pdonoso{at}alemana.cl

BACKGROUND: The Belgian legislation imposes single embryo transfer (SET) on women of <36 years in their first treatment cycle to avoid multiple pregnancies. The aim of this study is to assess the impact of this legislation on the outcome of preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) for inherited diseases in young women undergoing SET.

METHODS: A retrospective analysis of PGD cycles for monogenic disorders and translocations in women <36 years on their first treatment cycle. Two groups of patients were defined according to the implementation of the Belgian legislation: (i) double embryo transfer (DET), January 2001–June 2003 (ii) SET, July 2003–June 2005. The primary and secondary outcome measures were delivery per embryo transfer and multiple pregnancy rates, respectively. A subgroup analysis for monogenic disorders and translocations was performed.

RESULTS: 62 cycles were included in the DET group and 73 cycles in the SET group. The mean age, number of cumulus–oocyte complexes, number of fertilized oocytes, number of biopsied and cryopreserved embryos were comparable between both groups. There was no significant difference in the delivery rates between the DET and the SET groups (33.9% versus 27.4%, respectively). Multiple pregnancies were avoided when SET was performed. When monogenic disorders and chromosomal translocations were separately evaluated, no significant difference in the delivery rate after SET was observed.

CONCLUSIONS: The implementation of a SET policy in young women undergoing PGD for monogenic disorders and translocations enables a significant reduction of multiple pregnancies without significantly affecting the delivery rate.

Key words: ICSI/multiple pregnancy/preimplantation genetic diagnosis/single embryo transfer

Submitted on August 19, 2006; resubmitted on November 6, 2006; accepted on November 11, 2006.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
T. El-Toukhy, A. Kamal, E. Wharf, J. Grace, V. Bolton, Y. Khalaf, and P. Braude
Reduction of the multiple pregnancy rate in a preimplantation genetic diagnosis programme after introduction of single blastocyst transfer and cryopreservation of blastocysts biopsied on Day 3
Hum. Reprod., June 30, 2009; (2009) dep172v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
Y. Khalaf and T. El-Toukhy
Single embryo transfer in preimplantation genetic diagnosis cycles for women <36 years does not reduce delivery rate
Hum. Reprod., September 1, 2007; 22(9): 2575 - 2576.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
P. Donoso, W. Verpoest, and P. Devroey
Reply: Single embryo transfer in preimplantation genetic diagnosis cycles for women <36 years does not reduce delivery rate
Hum. Reprod., September 1, 2007; 22(9): 2576 - 2576.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.