Skip Navigation


Hum. Reprod. Advance Access originally published online on February 8, 2007
Human Reproduction 2007 22(5):1327-1334; doi:10.1093/humrep/dem001
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF ) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
22/5/1327    most recent
dem001v1
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (2)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kosmas, I.P.
Right arrow Articles by Devroey, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kosmas, I.P.
Right arrow Articles by Devroey, P.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2007. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Ultrasound-guided embryo transfer does not offer any benefit in clinical outcome: a randomized controlled trial

I.P. Kosmas1, R. Janssens, L. De Munck, H. Al Turki, J. Van der Elst, H. Tournaye and P. Devroey

Centre for Reproductive Medicine, Dutch-Speaking Brussels Free University, Brussels, Belgium

1 To whom correspondence should be addressed at: Centre for Reproductive Medicine, Dutch-Speaking Brussels Free University, Brussels, Belgium. E-mail: kosmasioannis{at}gmail.com

BACKGROUND: Ultrasound-guided embryo transfer (ET) is widely suggested as a standard clinical practice that improves overall embryo implantation and pregnancy rates. Various studies of this issue suffer from methodological pitfalls, so that a randomized controlled trial, which overcomes these problems, might be valuable.

METHODS: Three hundred women aged <40, who underwent fresh ET, were included in this randomized, double-blind controlled trial. The K-J-SPPE echo tip soft catheter was used for the ultrasound-guided ET and the traditional K-Soft catheter for ETs not using ultrasound. One experienced operator performed all ETs. The primary study outcome was overall pregnancy rate (defined as the number of positive hCG results per transfer).

RESULTS: No significant differences between groups were found regarding baseline patient and embryological characteristics, except for male factor and unexplained infertility (higher in the blind and ultrasound-guided ET group, repectively, P < 0.05). Overall pregnancy rates were 53.3 and 51.3% in the ultrasound-guided and blind ET group, respectively. Two ectopic pregnancies were reported in each group. Difficulty in cervical negotiation did not differ between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS: In patients undergoing ET by an experienced operator, ultrasound guidance did not provide any benefit in terms of overall clinical pregnancy and embryo implantation rates.

Key words: embryo transfer/implantation/IVF/pregnancy/ultrasound

Submitted on August 10, 2006; resubmitted on November 7, 2006; resubmitted on December 17, 2006; accepted on January 2, 2007.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 The Obstetrician and GynaecologistHome page
I. Kosmas, J. Van der Elst, P. Devroey, and H. Tournaye
Elective single embryo transfer
Obstet Gynaecol (Lond), July 1, 2008; 10(3): 163 - 169.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Hum ReprodHome page
B. Ata and B. Urman
Ultrasound guided embryo transfer does not offer any benefit in clinical outcome: a randomized controlled study
Hum. Reprod., February 1, 2008; 23(2): 457 - 458.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Hum ReprodHome page
I.P. Kosmas, H. Tournaye, J. Van der Elst, and P. Devroey
Reply: Ultrasound guided embryo transfer does not offer any benefit in clinical outcome: a randomized controlled study
Hum. Reprod., February 1, 2008; 23(2): 458 - 459.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.