Skip Navigation


Hum. Reprod. Advance Access originally published online on April 27, 2007
Human Reproduction 2007 22(6):1744-1750; doi:10.1093/humrep/dem073
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF ) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
22/6/1744    most recent
dem073v1
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (3)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kirk, E.
Right arrow Articles by Bourne, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kirk, E.
Right arrow Articles by Bourne, T.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2007. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Rationalizing the follow-up of pregnancies of unknown location

E. Kirk1,4, G. Condous1,3, B. Van Calster2, S. Van Huffel2, D. Timmerman2 and T. Bourne1

1 Early Pregnancy, Gynaecological Ultrasound and MAS Unit, St Georges Hospital, London, UK 2 Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Hospital Gasthuisberg and Department of Electrical Engineering (ESAT), KU Leuven, Belgium 3 Early Pregnancy Unit, Nepean Clinical School University of Sydney Nepean Hospital, Sydney, Australia

4 Correspondence address. Early Pregnancy and Gynaecological Ultrasound Unit, St George's, University of London, Cranmer Terrace, London SW17 0RE, UK. Tel: +44 208 725 0050; Fax: +44208 725 0094; E-mail: ejkirk{at}hotmail.co.uk

BACKGROUND: To develop a strategy to rationalize the follow-up of pregnancies of unknown location (PULs) based on the predicted outcome using a mathematical model.

METHODS: Prospective interventional study. Women classified with a PUL had serum hCG levels taken at 0 and 48 h. A logistic regression model was used to predict PUL outcome at 48 h. Women were managed according to the model's prediction. If the model predicted an intrauterine pregnancy (IUP) or ectopic pregnancy (EP), women underwent a repeat scan on day 7; if the model predicted a failing PUL and the hCG ratio was also <0.87, these women were discharged; if the model predicted a failing PUL and the hCG ratio was ≥0.87, serum hCG was repeated on day 7.

RESULTS: Three hundred and sixty-three PULs were included; the final clinical outcomes were 22 (63.1%) failing PULs, 111 (30.6%) IUPs and 23 (6.3%) EPs. 88.7% (322/363) had the location of their pregnancy confirmed in the time period according to the study protocol, i.e. day 2 for failing PULs, day 7 for IUPs and EPs. By day 7, 97.5% (354/363) had been given a diagnosis and could be eliminated from any further follow-up. Only one woman (0.3%) underwent surgical intervention for the diagnosis of her pregnancy location—a diagnostic laparoscopy and surgical evacuation.

CONCLUSION: The logistic regression model developed could be used as a basis on which to rationalize the management of PULs as it can successfully minimize their follow-up by reducing the number of visits, scans and blood tests, as well as intervention rates.

Key words: pregnancy/ectopic/unknown location/regression model/hCG

Submitted on November 5, 2006; resubmitted on February 11, 2007; accepted on February 20, 2007.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.