Skip Navigation


Hum. Reprod. Advance Access originally published online on May 15, 2007
Human Reproduction 2007 22(7):2040-2050; doi:10.1093/humrep/dem103
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF ) Freely available
Right arrow Supplementary Data
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
22/7/2040    most recent
dem103v1
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (2)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Yee, S.
Right arrow Articles by Greenblatt, E. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Yee, S.
Right arrow Articles by Greenblatt, E. M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2007. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

A follow-up study of women who donated oocytes to known recipient couples for altruistic reasons

Samantha Yee1,2,4, Jason A. Hitkari2 and Ellen M. Greenblatt2,3

1 Department of Social Work 2 Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada 3 Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada

4 Correspondence address. Mount Sinai Hospital, 600 University Avenue, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5G 1X5. Fax: 1-416-586-8791; E-mail: syee{at}mtsinai.on.ca

BACKGROUND: Current legislation in Canada allows for only altruistic gamete donation. Limited clinical data are available on the emotional and psychological impact of altruistic oocyte donation on known donors.

METHODS: Seventeen women who had donated oocytes to known parties without financial compensation agreed to receive the oocyte donation questionnaire (ODQ) to explore the psychological domains of altruistic oocyte donation.

RESULTS: Thirteen ODQ were returned, giving a response rate of 76%. All subjects indicated that they were primarily motivated by a ‘desire to give and help’ the recipient couple. Most subjects did not find the donation decision difficult but some found the post-donation psychological adjustments challenging. Subjects also indicated that mandatory counselling on the psychological implications of oocyte donation was an important component of cycle preparation. The majority of subjects had disclosed the donation to others and felt that disclosure to the presumptive child was essential.

CONCLUSIONS: The findings provide clinical materials for conceptualizing the dynamics entailed by known altruistic oocyte donation, with regards to motivation, relationship implications, donor satisfaction and plans for disclosure. The data support the provision of psycho-social support services to help donors dealing with any residual emotional difficulties regardless of the outcome of oocyte donation.

Key words: oocyte donation/third-party conception/altruism/infertilty/IVF

Submitted on February 13, 2007; resubmitted on March 18, 2007; accepted on March 29, 2007.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
S. Purewal and O.B.A van den Akker
A study of the effect of message framing on oocyte donation
Hum. Reprod., December 1, 2009; 24(12): 3136 - 3143.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum Reprod UpdateHome page
S. Purewal and O.B.A. van den Akker
Systematic review of oocyte donation: investigating attitudes, motivations and experiences
Hum. Reprod. Update, September 1, 2009; 15(5): 499 - 515.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
S. Yee
'Gift without a price tag': altruism in anonymous semen donation
Hum. Reprod., January 1, 2009; 24(1): 3 - 13.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.