Skip Navigation


Hum. Reprod. Advance Access originally published online on July 17, 2007
Human Reproduction 2007 22(9):2449-2454; doi:10.1093/humrep/dem223
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF ) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
22/9/2449    most recent
dem223v1
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Safdarian, L.
Right arrow Articles by Rahimi, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Safdarian, L.
Right arrow Articles by Rahimi, E.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2007. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Clinical outcome with half-dose depot triptorelin is the same as reduced-dose daily buserelin in a long protocol of controlled ovarian stimulation for ICSI/embryo transfer: a randomized double-blind clinical trial (NCT00461916)

Leili Safdarian1, Farnoosh Soltani Mohammadi1, Ashraf Alleyassin1, Marzieh Aghahosseini1, Alipasha Meysamie2 and Eiman Rahimi3,4

1 Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Dr. Shariati Hospital, Medical Sciences/University of Tehran, North Kargar Avenue, Tehran 14114, Iran 2 Department of Community and Preventive Medicine, Medical Sciences/University of Tehran, Poursina Street, Ghods Street, Enghelab Square, Tehran, Iran 3 Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Medical Sciences/University of Tehran, Sina Hospital, Imam Khomeini Avenue, Tehran, Iran

4 Correspondence address. Tel: +98 912 38 38 464; Fax: +98 21 6671 6545; E-mail: medlars{at}gmail.com

BACKGROUND: Traditional doses of depot GnRH agonist may be excessive for ovarian stimulation. We compared half-dose depot triptorelin (Group I) with reduced-dose daily buserelin (Group II) in a long protocol ICSI/embryo transfer through a double-blind randomized clinical trial.

METHODS: Controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) was started by a pretreatment with oral contraceptives for 21 days. Then, 182 patients were randomized into two groups of 91. Group I received 1.87 mg triptorelin depot i.m. followed by daily s.c. injections of saline. Group II (reduced-dose protocol) received a bolus injection of i.m. saline followed by daily s.c. injections of 0.5 mg buserelin, which was then reduced to 0.25 mg at the start of human menopausal gonadotrophin stimulation. When transvaginal ultrasound showed at least two follicles of 16–20 mm diameter, HCG was given and ICSI was performed 40–42 h later.

RESULTS: No significant differences were seen in the mean (SD) number of follicles at HCG administration, as our primary outcome [10.3 (4.4) in Group I versus 11.1 (4.2) in Group II, P = 0.180, mean difference = 0.86, 95% confidence interval 0.39–2.11]. The other early results of COS, clinical and ongoing pregnancy rates, or early pregnancy loss were also not significantly different between the groups. Group I endured longer stimulation period [11.2 (1.8) days versus 10.6 (1.9), P = 0.030].

CONCULSIONS: Clinical outcomes were not significantly different between Group I and Group II.

Key words: depot triptorelin/daily buserelin/controlled ovarian stimulation/long protocol/ICSI

Submitted on April 22, 2007; resubmitted on June 7, 2007; accepted on June 21, 2007.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.