Skip Navigation


Hum. Reprod. Advance Access originally published online on July 17, 2007
Human Reproduction 2007 22(9):2455-2462; doi:10.1093/humrep/dem183
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF ) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
22/9/2455    most recent
dem183v1
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (2)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lintsen, A.M.E.
Right arrow Articles by Braat, D.D.M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lintsen, A.M.E.
Right arrow Articles by Braat, D.D.M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2007. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Predicting ongoing pregnancy chances after IVF and ICSI: a national prospective study

A.M.E. Lintsen1,5, M.J.C. Eijkemans2, C.C. Hunault3, C.A.M. Bouwmans4, L. Hakkaart4, J.D.F. Habbema2 and D.D.M. Braat1

1 Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, PO Box 9101, Nijmegen 6500 HB, The Netherlands 2 Department of Public Health, Erasmus Medical Center, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands 3 National Poisons Information Center, National Institute of Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, The Netherlands 4 Institute for Medical Technology Assessment, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands

5 Correspondence address. Tel: +31-24-3619573; Fax: +31-24-3668597; E-mail: a.lintsen{at}obgyn.umcn.nl

BACKGROUND: The Dutch IVF guideline suggests triage of patients for IVF based on diagnostic category, duration of infertility and female age. There is no evidence for the effectiveness of these criteria. We evaluated the predictive value of patient characteristics that are used in the Dutch IVF guideline and developed a model that predicts the IVF ongoing pregnancy chance within 12 months.

METHODS: In a national prospective cohort study, pregnancy chances after IVF and ICSI treatment were assessed. Couples eligible for IVF or ICSI were followed during 12 months, using the databases of 11 IVF centres and 20 transport IVF clinics. Kaplan–Meier analysis was performed to estimate the cumulative probability of an ongoing pregnancy, and Cox regression was used for assessing the effects of predictors of pregnancy.

RESULTS: 4928 couples starting IVF/ICSI treatment were prospectively followed. On average, couples had 1.8 cycles in 12 months for both IVF and ICSI. The 1-year probability of ongoing pregnancy was 44.8% (95% CI 42.1–47.5%). ICSI for severe oligospermia had a significantly higher ongoing pregnancy rate than IVF indicated treatments, with a multivariate Hazard ratio (HR) of 1.22 (95% CI 1.07–1.39). The success rates were comparable for all diagnostic categories of IVF. The highest success rate is at age 30, with a slight decline towards younger women and women up to 35 and a sharp drop after 35. Primary subfertility with a HR of 0.90 (95% CI 0.83–0.99) and duration of subfertility with a HR of 0.97 (95% CI 0.95–0.99) per year significantly affected the pregnancy chance.

CONCLUSIONS: The most important predictors of the pregnancy chance after IVF and ICSI are women's age and ICSI. The diagnostic category is of no consequence. Duration of subfertility and pregnancy history are of limited prognostic value.

Key words: IVF/ICSI/pregnancy/prediction model/prognostic factors

Submitted on March 5, 2007; resubmitted on May 21, 2007; accepted on May 22, 2007.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Am Board Fam MedHome page
J. B. Stanford, T. A. Parnell, and P. C. Boyle
Outcomes From Treatment of Infertility With Natural Procreative Technology in an Irish General Practice
J Am Board Fam Med, September 1, 2008; 21(5): 375 - 384.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
M.J.C. Eijkemans, A.M.E. Lintsen, C.C. Hunault, C.A.M. Bouwmans, L. Hakkaart, D.D.M. Braat, and J.D.F. Habbema
Pregnancy chances on an IVF/ICSI waiting list: a national prospective cohort study
Hum. Reprod., July 1, 2008; 23(7): 1627 - 1632.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
M.J. Lambers, S. Roek, L. Luttikhof, R. Schats, R. Homburg, P.G.A. Hompes, and C.B. Lambalk
A family history of twinning in relation to multiple implantation
Hum. Reprod., April 1, 2008; 23(4): 889 - 893.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.