Hum. Reprod. Advance Access originally published online on June 23, 2007
Human Reproduction 2007 22(9):2471-2475; doi:10.1093/humrep/dem181
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Can assisted reproductive technologies help to offset population ageing? An assessment of the demographic and economic impact of ART in Denmark and UK
RAND Europe, Westbrook Centre, Milton Road, Cambridge CB4 1YG, UK
1 Correspondence address. Tel: +44 1223 353329; Fax: +44 1223 358845; E-mail: hoorens{at}rand.org
Governments worldwide are searching for ways to cope with ageing populations as the demographic shift towards fewer and later births takes hold. The potential contribution of assisted reproductive technologies (ART) to increasing fertility rates has not yet been explored. This paper describes a preliminary study into the impact ART policies might have on population ageing. A deterministic model is developed to quantify the effects of ART policies on total fertility rate (TFR), and tested using data from the UK and Denmark. The population structure for 2050 is modelled to translate fertility rates into time-dependent population dynamics, and the costs of potential ART policies are investigated. If access to ART in the UK were increased to the level of Denmark, the TFR would increase by 0.04, from 1.64 to 1.68. The cumulative effect on the population structure would be a 1.7% decrease in old-age dependency ratio in 2050. Although the empirical models do not include behavioural components, the results demonstrate that ART does have potential to contribute to TFR and influence population structure, and that the direct costs associated with adopting ART as a population policy are comparable with those of existing policies commonly used by governments to influence fertility.
Key words: ART/infertility/demographic ageing/total fertility rate/population policy
* All authors work for RAND Europe, an independent, not-for-profit, research institution that helps improve policy and decision-making through objective research and analysis. RAND Europe, based in Cambridge, UK, is part of the globally operating think tank RAND Corporation. The authors have experience and expertise in policy analysis, population studies, health policy and economics.
Submitted on January 10, 2007; resubmitted on May 2, 2007; accepted on May 24, 2007.
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. D. F. Habbema, M. J.C. Eijkemans, G. Nargund, G. Beets, H. Leridon, and E. R. te Velde The effect of in vitro fertilization on birth rates in western countries Hum. Reprod., June 1, 2009; 24(6): 1414 - 1419. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Connolly, F. Gallo, S. Hoorens, and W. Ledger Assessing long-run economic benefits attributed to an IVF-conceived singleton based on projected lifetime net tax contributions in the UK Hum. Reprod., March 1, 2009; 24(3): 626 - 632. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Svensson, M. Connolly, F. Gallo, and L. Hagglund Long-term fiscal implications of subsidizing in-vitro fertilization in Sweden: A lifetime tax perspective Scand J Public Health, November 1, 2008; 36(8): 841 - 849. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Ziebe, P. Devroey, and on behalf of the State of the ART 2007 Workshop Gr Assisted reproductive technologies are an integrated part of national strategies addressing demographic and reproductive challenges Hum. Reprod. Update, November 1, 2008; 14(6): 583 - 592. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. R. te Velde, M. J.C. Eijkemans, G. Beets, and J. D. F. Habbema Can assisted reproductive technologies help to offset population ageing? Hum. Reprod., September 1, 2008; 23(9): 2173 - 2174. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Hoorens, F. Gallo, J. Cave, and J. Grant Reply: Can assisted reproductive technologies help offset population ageing? Hum. Reprod., September 1, 2008; 23(9): 2174 - 2175. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Leridon and R. Slama The impact of a decline in fecundity and of pregnancy postponement on final number of children and demand for assisted reproduction technology Hum. Reprod., June 1, 2008; 23(6): 1312 - 1319. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||


