Skip Navigation


Hum. Reprod. Advance Access originally published online on November 6, 2007
Human Reproduction 2008 23(1):17-28; doi:10.1093/humrep/dem355
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF ) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
23/1/17    most recent
dem355v1
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Milazzo, J.P.
Right arrow Articles by Rives, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Milazzo, J.P.
Right arrow Articles by Rives, N.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2007. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Comparison of conditions for cryopreservation of testicular tissue from immature mice

J.P. Milazzo1, L. Vaudreuil1, B. Cauliez3, E. Gruel1, L. Massé1, N. Mousset-Siméon1, B. Macé1 and N. Rives2,4

1 Reproductive Biology Laboratory—CECOS, Rouen University Hospital, Institute for Biomedical Research, University of Rouen, 1 rue de Germont, 76031 Rouen Cedex, France 2 Reproductive Biology Laboratory—CECOS, Rouen University Hospital & CIC Inserm 0204, Institute for Biomedical Research, University of Rouen, 76031 Rouen Cedex, France 3 Biochemistry Laboratory, Rouen University Hospital, Institute for Biomedical Research, University of Rouen, 76031 Rouen Cedex, France

4 Correspondence address. Tel: +2-32-888225; Fax: +2-35-982007; E-mail: nathalie.rives{at}chu-rouen.fr

BACKGROUND: Cryopreservation of immature testicular tissue could be considered as a major step in fertility preservation for young boys with cancer. In the present study, eight different freezing protocols were evaluated in immature mice testis.

METHODS: Testis from six-day-old mice were frozen using either 1,2-propanediol (PROH) or dimethylsulphoxide (DMSO: D) at 1.5 M. Different cooling rate curves were tested: (i) controlled slow protocol with seeding (CS+) or (ii) without seeding (CS–), (iii) controlled rapid protocol and (iv) non-controlled protocol. Cryodamage of seminiferous cords was semi-quantitatively determined, establishing a scoring of alterations. Cell viability and apoptosis induction were assessed on testicular cell suspensions immediately after digestion (D0) and after a 20-h culture period (D1). Cells recovered after digestion of 100 mg tissue and the rate of living and non-apoptotic cells were quantified at D0 and D1. A long-term culture (9 days) of testis pieces was carried out for the protocol offering the best survival. Testosterone production, intratubular cell proliferation and tubule growth were assessed.

RESULTS: DMSO produced optimal results in the different cooling rate curves tested when compared with PROH. Optimal results were obtained for the DCS– procedure (P < 0.05). Testosterone production, tubule growth and cell proliferation of post-thaw pieces were similar to fresh samples.

CONCLUSIONS: Testis freezing with 1.5 M DMSO in a CS– procedure was found to maintain not only immature testicular tissue architecture, but also viability of testicular cells, endocrine and partial exocrine functions of the testis. Semi-quantitative evaluation of seminiferous cord cryodamage can be effectively used to rapidly screen optimal freezing conditions and as a possible quality control in a human application.

Key words: cryopreservation/male germ cell/immature testicular tissue

Submitted on February 28, 2007; resubmitted on September 21, 2007; accepted on October 8, 2007.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ReproductionHome page
J. Ehmcke and S. Schlatt
Animal models for fertility preservation in the male
Reproduction, December 1, 2008; 136(6): 717 - 723.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
C. Wyns, A. Van Langendonckt, F.-X. Wese, J. Donnez, and M. Curaba
Long-term spermatogonial survival in cryopreserved and xenografted immature human testicular tissue
Hum. Reprod., November 1, 2008; 23(11): 2402 - 2414.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.