Skip Navigation


Hum. Reprod. Advance Access originally published online on July 8, 2008
Human Reproduction 2008 23(10):2182-2184; doi:10.1093/humrep/den184
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF ) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
23/10/2182    most recent
den184v1
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Related articles in Hum. Reprod.
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (2)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pennings, G.
Right arrow Articles by Devroey, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Pennings, G.
Right arrow Articles by Devroey, P.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2008. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

ESHRE Task Force on Ethics and Law 15: Cross-border reproductive care

G. Pennings1, G. de Wert, F. Shenfield, J. Cohen, B. Tarlatzis and P. Devroey

Bioethics Institute Ghent, Ghent University, Blandijnberg 2, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium

1 Correspondence address. E-mail: guido.pennings{at}ugent.be

This paper analyses the ethical aspects of cross-border reproductive care. Ethical questions are raised by some of the main reasons of cross-border travelling, i.e. law evasion and unequal access to treatment. The phenomenon also generates possible conflicts linked to the responsibility of the professionals. Three points are discussed: the moral obligation of the physician to refer the patient, his/her duty to provide information and counselling and the acceptability of fee-splitting. The recommendations focus on measures to reduce or limit the number of patients that have to travel abroad and on steps to guarantee the safety and quality of the treatment wherever it is provided.

Key words: access/cross-border care/justice/law evasion/reproductive tourism

Submitted on April 8, 2008; resubmitted on April 8, 2008; accepted on April 21, 2008.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?

Related articles in Hum. Reprod.:

Editor's Choice
André Van Steirteghem
Hum. Reprod. 2008 23: 2177-2178. [Extract] [FREE Full Text]  



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Hum ReprodHome page
G. Pennings, C. Autin, W. Decleer, A. Delbaere, L. Delbeke, A. Delvigne, D. De Neubourg, P. Devroey, M. Dhont, T. D'Hooghe, et al.
Cross-border reproductive care in Belgium
Hum. Reprod., December 1, 2009; 24(12): 3108 - 3118.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Hum Reprod UpdateHome page
S. Purewal and O.B.A. van den Akker
Systematic review of oocyte donation: investigating attitudes, motivations and experiences
Hum. Reprod. Update, September 1, 2009; 15(5): 499 - 515.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.