Skip Navigation


Hum. Reprod. Advance Access originally published online on August 6, 2008
Human Reproduction 2008 23(11):2549-2554; doi:10.1093/humrep/den286
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF ) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
23/11/2549    most recent
den286v1
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (2)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Griesinger, G.
Right arrow Articles by Ludwig, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Griesinger, G.
Right arrow Articles by Ludwig, M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2008. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Ovarian stimulation for IVF has no quantitative association with birthweight: a registry study

G. Griesinger1,4, E.M. Kolibianakis2, K. Diedrich1 and M. Ludwig3

1 Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Campus Luebeck, University Clinic of Schleswig-Holstein, Luebeck, Germany 2 Unit for Human Reproduction, First Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece 3 ENDOKRINOLOGIKUM Hamburg, Lornsenstrasse 4-6, 22767 Hamburg, Germany

4 Correspondence address. UK-SH, Campus Luebeck, Ratzeburger Allee 160, 23538 Luebeck, Germany. Tel: +49-451-500-2134; Fax: +49-451-500-2170; E-mail: georg.griesinger{at}frauenklinik.uni-luebeck.de

BACKGROUND: Singleton children born after IVF are of lower birthweight compared with their naturally conceived peers. It has been hypothesized that ovarian stimulation might be associated with low birthweight in children born after IVF. The aim of the present study was to explore whether or not a dose relationship exists between ovarian stimulation and birthweight in singletons born after ovarian stimulation for IVF.

METHODS: Using a national IVF registry database with a coverage of 65–70%, parental demographic variables, treatment cycle variables and neonatal variables were retrieved from all IVF treatment cycles in women between 25 and 35 years of age in which gonadotrophins were used for ovarian stimulation and a fresh embryo transfer resulting in singleton live birth was performed. Birthweight was standardized as a z-score, adjusting for gestational week at delivery and fetal sex, using data from a large reference population. Multivariate regression analysis was used to investigate the association between the dependent variable z-score and the independent predictor variables maternal age (years), maternal weight (kg), maternal height (cm), maternal body mass index (BMI) (kg/m2), duration of infertility (years), number of embryos transferred (n), duration of stimulation (days), consumption of gonadotrophins (ampoules) and number of oocytes retrieved (n).

RESULTS: Data retrieval yielded 32 416 singleton live births after IVF, with a mean (±SD) z-score of –0.25 (±1.0) and –0.23 (±1.0) for male and female neonates, respectively. Regression analysis indicated that maternal weight, maternal height, duration of infertility and the number of embryos transferred were statistically significant determinants of the birthweight of singletons after ovarian stimulation IVF. Parameters of ovarian stimulation (duration of stimulation, consumption of gonadotrophins, number of oocytes retrieved), maternal BMI and maternal age did not significantly predict birthweight.

CONCLUSIONS: Features reflecting ovarian stimulation do not correlate with birthweight. Therefore, ovarian stimulation is unlikely to be a factor affecting birthweight of IVF pregnancies.

Key words: birthweight/ovarian stimulation/adverse outcome/child health/IVF

Submitted on January 16, 2008; resubmitted on June 23, 2008; accepted on June 30, 2008.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
J. C. Dumoulin, J. A. Land, A. P. Van Montfoort, E. C. Nelissen, E. Coonen, J. G. Derhaag, I. L. Schreurs, G. A. Dunselman, A. D. Kester, J. P. Geraedts, et al.
Effect of in vitro culture of human embryos on birthweight of newborns
Hum. Reprod., March 1, 2010; 25(3): 605 - 612.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ReproductionHome page
M. A. Santos, E. W Kuijk, and N. S Macklon
The impact of ovarian stimulation for IVF on the developing embryo
Reproduction, January 1, 2010; 139(1): 23 - 34.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
K.J. Middelburg, M.J. Heineman, A.F. Bos, M. Pereboom, V. Fidler, and M. Hadders-Algra
The Groningen ART cohort study: ovarian hyperstimulation and the in vitro procedure do not affect neurological outcome in infancy
Hum. Reprod., December 1, 2009; 24(12): 3119 - 3126.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.