Skip Navigation


Hum. Reprod. Advance Access originally published online on April 27, 2008
Human Reproduction 2008 23(7):1644-1653; doi:10.1093/humrep/den150
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF ) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
23/7/1644    most recent
den150v1
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (7)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Shih, W.
Right arrow Articles by Baker, H.W.G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Shih, W.
Right arrow Articles by Baker, H.W.G.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2008. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Factors affecting low birthweight after assisted reproduction technology: difference between transfer of fresh and cryopreserved embryos suggests an adverse effect of oocyte collection

W. Shih1, D.D. Rushford1, H. Bourne2, C. Garrett1, J.C. McBain2, D.L. Healy3 and H.W.G. Baker1,2,4

1 Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia 2 Melbourne IVF Reproductive Services, The Royal Women's Hospital, 283 Cardigan Street Carlton, Melbourne, Australia 3 Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia

4 Correspondence address. Tel: +61-3-9344-2130; Fax: +61-3-9347-1761; E-mail: g.baker{at}unimelb.edu.au

BACKGROUND: Data show that differences exist in the birthweight of singletons after frozen embryo transfer (FET) compared with fresh transfer or gamete intra-Fallopian transfer (GIFT). Factors associated with low birthweight (LBW) after assisted reproduction technology (ART) were studied.

METHODS: Birthweight, distribution of birthweight, z-score, LBW (<2500 g), gestation and percentage preterm (<37 weeks) for singleton births >19 weeks gestation, conceived by ART or non-ART treatments (ovulation induction and artificial insemination) between 1978 and 2005 were analysed for one large Australian clinic.

RESULTS: For first births, the mean birthweight was significantly (P < 0.005) lower, and LBW and preterm birth more frequent for GIFT (mean = 3133 g, SD = 549, n = 109, LBW = 10.9% and preterm = 10.0%), IVF (3166, 676, 1615, 11.7, 12.5) and ICSI (3206, 697, 1472, 11.5, 11.9) than for FET (3352, 615, 2383, 6.5, 9.2) and non-ART conceptions (3341, 634, 940, 7.1, 8.6). Regression modelling showed ART treatment before 1993 and fresh embryo transfer were negatively related to birthweight after including other covariates: gestation, male sex, parity, birth defects, Caesarean section, perinatal death and socio-economic status.

CONCLUSIONS: Birthweights were lower and LBW rates higher after GIFT or fresh embryo transfer than after FET. Results for FET were similar to those for non-ART conceptions. This suggests IVF and ICSI laboratory procedures affecting the embryos are not causal but other factors operating in the woman, perhaps associated with oocyte collection itself, which affect endometrial receptivity, implantation or early pregnancy, may be responsible for LBW with ART.

Key words: assisted reproduction technology/low birthweight/oocyte collection

Submitted on November 29, 2007; resubmitted on March 14, 2008; accepted on March 29, 2008.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
S. Pelkonen, R. Koivunen, M. Gissler, S. Nuojua-Huttunen, A.-M. Suikkari, C. Hyden-Granskog, H. Martikainen, A. Tiitinen, and A.-L. Hartikainen
Perinatal outcome of children born after frozen and fresh embryo transfer: the Finnish cohort study 1995-2006
Hum. Reprod., February 2, 2010; (2010): dep477v1 - dep477.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
J. L. Halliday, O. C. Ukoumunne, H.W. G. Baker, S. Breheny, A. M. Jaques, C. Garrett, D. Healy, and D. Amor
Increased risk of blastogenesis birth defects, arising in the first 4 weeks of pregnancy, after assisted reproductive technologies
Hum. Reprod., January 1, 2010; 25(1): 59 - 65.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
D.L. Healy, S. Breheny, J. Halliday, A. Jaques, D. Rushford, C. Garrett, J.M. Talbot, and H.W.G. Baker
Prevalence and risk factors for obstetric haemorrhage in 6730 singleton births after assisted reproductive technology in Victoria Australia
Hum. Reprod., January 1, 2010; 25(1): 265 - 274.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
U.-B. Wennerholm, V. Soderstrom-Anttila, C. Bergh, K. Aittomaki, J. Hazekamp, K.-G. Nygren, A. Selbing, and A. Loft
Children born after cryopreservation of embryos or oocytes: a systematic review of outcome data
Hum. Reprod., September 1, 2009; 24(9): 2158 - 2172.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
D.J. Amor, J.X. Xu, J.L. Halliday, I. Francis, D.L. Healy, S. Breheny, H.W.G. Baker, and A.M. Jaques
Pregnancies conceived using assisted reproductive technologies (ART) have low levels of pregnancy-associated plasma protein-A (PAPP-A) leading to a high rate of false-positive results in first trimester screening for Down syndrome
Hum. Reprod., June 1, 2009; 24(6): 1330 - 1338.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
G. Griesinger, E.M. Kolibianakis, K. Diedrich, and M. Ludwig
Ovarian stimulation for IVF has no quantitative association with birthweight: a registry study
Hum. Reprod., November 1, 2008; 23(11): 2549 - 2554.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.