Skip Navigation


Hum. Reprod. Advance Access originally published online on September 14, 2008
Human Reproduction 2009 24(1):139-145; doi:10.1093/humrep/den338
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF )
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
24/1/139    most recent
den338v1
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Poote, A.E.
Right arrow Articles by van den Akker, O.B.A
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Poote, A.E.
Right arrow Articles by van den Akker, O.B.A
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2008. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

British women's attitudes to surrogacy

A.E. Poote1 and O.B.A van den Akker2,3,4

1 Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry CV4 7AL, UK 2 Department of Psychology Middlesex University Hendon Campus, The Burroughs, Hendon, London NW4 4BT, UK 3 Centre for Human Reproductive Sciences, Birmingham Women's Health Care Trust, Metchley Park Road, Edgbaston, Birmingham B15 2TG, UK

4 Correspondence address. Tel: +44-208-411-6953; Fax: +44-208-411-4259; E-mail: o.vandenakker{at}mdx.ac.uk

BACKGROUND: There has been little interest in the research literature on public opinions regarding assisted conception and surrogacy, particularly in European countries, despite the growing evidence showing that problems in adaptation and coping may be related to perceived normative values. This study investigated British women's attitudes to surrogacy using components of the theory of planned behaviour (TPB).

METHODS: Questionnaires on attitudes to surrogacy and reasons for parenthood were completed by 187 women from the general public.

RESULTS: Significant socio-demographic differences were found between women who were possibly willing (n = 76) and those who were unwilling (n = 111) to become surrogate mothers. General attitudes to surrogacy also differed between groups (P = 0.000). This study supported the predictive utility of components of the TPB, and differentiated adequately between groups on attitudes to recruitment for surrogacy (P = 0.000), the consequences of surrogacy (P = 0.000), factors that induce people to become surrogates (P = 0.000), social support (P = 0.000), having personal control (P = 0.002) and reasons for parenthood (P = 0.000). Age (P = 0.000), attitudes to advertising (P = 0.02) and the consequences of surrogacy (P = 0.05) predicted (un)willingness to become a potential surrogate mother.

CONCLUSIONS: Further research is needed with larger sample sizes of potential surrogates to determine whether the predictive attitudes reported here translate to actual behaviours. The larger group which was not interested in considering becoming a surrogate scored significantly more negatively on all attitudes towards surrogacy. The negative attitudes reported by the ‘unwilling to consider being a surrogate’ group may reflect attitudes held by the majority of the population and are likely to be influenced by reports of stigma associated with surrogacy.

Key words: surrogacy/parenthood/surrogate mother/gestational surrogacy/genetic surrogacy

Submitted on May 23, 2008; resubmitted on August 12, 2008; accepted on August 18, 2008.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.