Skip Navigation


Hum. Reprod. Advance Access originally published online on July 14, 2009
Human Reproduction 2009 24(10):2523-2530; doi:10.1093/humrep/dep239
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF )
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
24/10/2523    most recent
dep239v1
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Related articles in Hum. Reprod.
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by la Cour Freiesleben, N.
Right arrow Articles by Nyboe Andersen, A.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by la Cour Freiesleben, N.
Right arrow Articles by Nyboe Andersen, A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2009. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Individual versus standard dose of rFSH in a mild stimulation protocol for intrauterine insemination: a randomized study

N. la Cour Freiesleben1,5, K. Lossl1, J. Bogstad2, H.E. Bredkjær3, B. Toft4, M. Rosendahl1, A. Loft1, S. Bangsboll1, A. Pinborg1 and A. Nyboe Andersen1

1 The Fertility Clinic, Section 4071, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark 2 The Fertility Clinic, Copenhagen University Hospital, Hvidovre Hospital, 2650 Hvidovre, Denmark 3 The Fertility Clinic, Holbæk Sygehus, 4300, Holbæk, Denmark 4 The Fertility Clinic, Brædstrup Hospital, 8740 Brædstrup, Denmark

5 Correspondence address. E-mail: ninalcf{at}hotmail.com

BACKGROUND: Controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) and intrauterine insemination (IUI) are often used as the first-line treatment for subfertile couples. To minimize the variability in ovarian response in patients' first treatment cycle, we recently developed a recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone (rFSH) dosage nomogram. The nomogram has now been tested.

METHODS: Multicentre randomized controlled trial (RCT) including 228 ovulatory patients scheduled for COS and IUI. Patients were randomized to ‘individual’ (50–100 IU rFSH/day, n = 113) or ‘standard’ (75 IU rFSH/day, n = 115) dose. ‘Individual’ dose was prescribed according to the nomogram, which was based on patients' body weight and antral follicle count. The primary end-point was the proportion of patients with two to three follicles ≥14 mm (maximum two follicles ≥18 mm) on the day of hCG (leading follicle = 18 mm). Primary analysis was made by intention-to-treat.

RESULTS: In the ‘individual’ group, 79/113 (70%) of the patients developed two to three follicles versus 64/115 (56%) in the ‘standard’ group [absolute difference = 14.3 percentage points; 95% confidence interval (CI) 2–26, P = 0.03; absolute difference = 14.4; 95% CI 2–27, P = 0.02, when adjusting for centre]. Among patients with two to three follicles, the proportion of patients with two follicles was 46/79 (58%) in the ‘individual’ group versus 34/64 (53%) in the ‘standard’ group, P = 0.54. Ongoing pregnancy rate was 23/113 (20%) in the ‘individual’ group and 21/115 (18%) in the ‘standard’ group and the rate of multiple gestations was 1/113 (1%) versus 5/115 (4%), P = 0.21.

CONCLUSIONS: This RCT is the first to clinically test a dosage nomogram in ovulatory IUI patients' first rFSH treatment cycle. Dosing according to the nomogram was superior to standard dosing.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT00374634 [ClinicalTrials.gov] .

Key words: IUI/controlled ovarian stimulation/individual dosing/dosage nomogram/ovarian response

Submitted on March 25, 2009; resubmitted on June 4, 2009; accepted on June 10, 2009.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?

Related articles in Hum. Reprod.:

Editor's Choice
Andre Van Steirteghem
Hum. Reprod. 2009 24: 2387-2388. [Extract] [Full Text]  





Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.